Crawford v Haughton: QBD 1972

The defendant appealed a conviction for using a vehicle, which had been adapted for stock car racing, without insurance. He did not give evidence, but he was present and he admitted that he was the owner of the vehicle.
Held: The court allowed his appeal because there was no evidence that the actual driver of the vehicle was employed by him.

Citations:

[1972] RTR 125

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedJones v Director of Public Prosecutions Admn 26-Mar-1998
A van was stopped carrying a delivery of coal. The insurance was for social domestic and pleasure purposes only. The owner appealed a conviction for using it without insurance.
Held: ‘using’ when the description of the offence in connection . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Road Traffic

Updated: 13 May 2022; Ref: scu.190482