Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (substantially the same); Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Preliminary objection rejected (victim); Violation of Art. 6-1; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Costs and expenses award – Convention proceedings
[1982] ECHR 10, 8304/78, [1982] 5 EHRR 334
Worldi, Bailii
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – J, Regina v CACD 2-Jul-2001
Orse Attorney General’s Reference No 2 of 2001
The AG sought to appeal from the decision that an indictment against the seven defendants should be stayed on the ground that there had been a breach of Article 6(1). They were accused of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 03 September 2021; Ref: scu.164901
