Copas and Another v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead: CA 7 Feb 2001

Land had first been excluded from the green belt, but then the plan had been revised. The revision was challenged, saying that a revision required exceptional circumstances making a revision necessary.
Held: there are not two tests, exceptional circumstances and necessity, but one composite test. The revision was set aside.
The Master Of The Rolls Lord Justice Simon Brown And Lord Justice Longmore
[2001] EWCA Civ 180
Bailii
Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 66
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedCarpets of Worth Limited v Wire Forest District Council 1991
. .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 02 January 2021; Ref: scu.147426