The plaintiff had contracted with the defendants, but became ill and was unable to complete the contract.
Held: His defence of frustration succeeded.
Citations:
[1966] 1 WLR 87
Statutes:
Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 1(3)
Cited by:
Cited – Atwal and Another v Rochester TCC 9-Jul-2010
The claimants had engaged the defendant to carry out building works. He became ill part way through and the works were not completed. They now said he was in repudiatory breach of the contract. The defendant said that the contract was frustrated, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 06 May 2022; Ref: scu.427354
