References:  Ch 80,  2 All ER 601
Coram: Justice Nourse
Ratio: If a decision of a court has been reached after full consideration of an earlier decision which went the other way, it should not be open to review on a third occasion when the same point arose for decision.
Nourse J said: ‘There must come a time when a point is normally to be treated as having been settled at first instance. I think that should be when the earlier decision has been fully considered, but not followed, in a later one. Consistently with the modern approach of the judges of this court to an earlier decision of one of their number . . I would make an exception only in the case, which must be rare, where a third judge is convinced that the second was wrong in not following the first.’
This case is cited by:
- Cited – In re Cromptons Leisure Machines Ltd ChD (Times 27-Dec-06)
The section gave the court a jurisdiction to authorise payments to people would be preferred creditors in a winding up. . .
- Cited – Futter and Another v Futter and Others ChD (Bailii,  EWHC 449 (Ch),  Pens LR 145,  STC 982,  STI 1442,  BTC 455,  WTLR 609)
Various family settlements had been created. The trustees wished to use the rule in Hastings-Bass to re-open decisions they had made after receiving incorrect advice.
Held: The deeds were set aside as void. The Rule in Hastings-Bass derives . .
- Cited – Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council and Others ChD (Bailii,  EWHC 1022 (Ch),  2 EGLR 93,  NPC 58,  JPL 1303,  20 EG 145,  30 EG 64)
The claimant sought a delaration that it had a right of way over an access road. The defendants said that the agreement fell foul of the 1989 Act.
Held: The claimant was not entitled to the declaration. Agreements under the 1990 Act are . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 15 March 2019