Knowledge of the undue influence of a husband over his wife in securing her signature to a charge is required before a lender is bound by that undue influence.
Judges:
Sir John Romilly MR
Citations:
(1855) 20 Beav 524
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2); Barclays Bank plc v Harris; Midland Bank plc v Wallace, etc HL 11-Oct-2001
Wives had charged the family homes to secure their husband’s business borrowings, and now resisted possession orders, claiming undue influence.
Held: Undue influence is an equitable protection created to undo the effect of excess influence of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Equity
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.224817
