Coats v Strathclyde Fire Board: EAT 3 Nov 2009

EAT Firefighter, who was also trade union health and safety representative, claimed that, having made a protected disclosure, he had suffered a detriment (section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996) and been refused permission as a health and safety representative to take time off for the performance of health and safety functions. Claim dismissed. Perversity appeal not upheld.

Citations:

[2009] UKEAT 0022 – 09 – 0311

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Employment Rights Act 1996 44

Employment

Updated: 13 August 2022; Ref: scu.393334