Clarke v London Borough of Enfield: CA 9 May 2002

Where a decision of a public decision-maker is quashed and the decision falls to be re-taken, it will or at least may be re-taken in light of the legal and factual context prevailing at the time the fresh decision is made.
[2002] EWCA Civ 1278
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedRegina (Nadarajah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abdi v Secretary of State for the Home Department CA 22-Nov-2005
The asylum applicant challenged a certificate given by the respondent that the claim for asylum was manifestly ill-founded. The respondent had made a mistake in applying the appropriate policy, but had sought to correct the error. The claimants . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 February 2021; Ref: scu.217151