Decision after successful request for judicial review of decision to grant planning permission. The respondent and interested party resisted costs orders saying that the claimant had not been successful on all points.
Held: In general the award should be made, with limited exceptions.
Judges:
Haddon-Cave J
Citations:
[2013] EWHC 3558 (Admin)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Budgen v Andrew Gardner Partnership CA 31-Jul-2002
The defendant firm of solicitors appealed an order for costs against it based upon a percentage calculation. They sought an issues based costs order.
Held: Where there was insufficient information upon which to calculate an issues based costs . .
Cited – Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of Canada and others v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (Uk) and Another ComC 16-Nov-2006
. .
Cited – HLB Kidsons (A Firm) v Lloyds Underwriters (Policy No 621/Pkid00101) and others Comc 22-Nov-2007
. .
Cited – Goodwin v Bennetts UK Ltd (Costs) CA 11-Dec-2008
. .
Cited – Fox v Foundation Piling Ltd CA 7-Jul-2011
Parties are entitled to make a Calderbank offer outside the framework of Part 36. The precise formulation of such an offer would of course depend upon the facts of a particular case, but the offer would be made without prejudice save as to costs . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Costs
Updated: 27 November 2022; Ref: scu.517805
