Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Chawla v Hare: ChD 27 Oct 2005

Citations:

[2005] EWHC 3214 (Ch)

Links:

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Contract

Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.239286

Posted on July 1, 2022July 1, 2022 by dlsPosted in Contract

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Elgin v Wild Duck Inn: FENI 8 Aug 2003

Next Next post: Britt v Buckinghamshire County Council: CA 1963

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

Director of Public Prosecutions v Bury Magistrates’ Court: Admn 13 Dec 2007
Gnezele, Regina (on the Application of) v Leeds City Council and Another: Admn 11 Dec 2007
Gungor, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 15 Aug 2008
Farrand v Cooper: 25 Apr 1862
A E Yates Trenchless Solutions Ltd v Black and Veatch Ltd: TCC 19 Dec 2008
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AR and others: Admn 14 Nov 2008
K, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 24 Sep 2008
RD and Another, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Admn 31 Oct 2008
MH and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 23 Oct 2008
Manchester City Council, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs: Admn 14 Dec 2007
Littman, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Barnet: Admn 20 Dec 2007
Congleton Engineering Developments Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 1 Sep 2008
Heys v Tindall: 25 May 1861
Green v Saddington: 1857
D v Bedfordshire County Council and Another: Admn 4 Nov 2008
Don Valley Precision Engineers Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 1 Sep 2008
Bewley v Revenue and Customs: VDT 1 Sep 2008
Gartenart Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 11 Sep 2008
Gabriel Mckeon v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 19 Dec 2007
Munir, Regina v: CACD 10 Nov 2008
Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate: HCJ 31 Oct 2007
Rapos v Slovakia: ECHR 20 May 2008
The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Isle of Wight Council, Mid-Suffolk District Council, South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, West Berkshire District Council: ECJ 12 Jun 2008
Manley and Another v New Forest District Council: Admn 6 Nov 2007
British Board of Film Classification, Regina (on the Application of) v Video Appeals Committee: Admn 21 Dec 2007
Crown Prosecution Service v Gloucester Justices: Admn 17 Jun 2008
British Telecommunications v Office of Communications: CAT 20 May 2008
Crown Prosecution Service v Brown: Admn 20 Dec 2005
Attorney General v Ali: Admn 13 May 2008
Rwenpower Plc v Cooper (Valuation Officer): LT 23 Jun 2008
McCormack v Tribunal De Grande Instance, Quimper, France: Admn 20 May 2008
Hutchison 3G UK Limited v Office of Communications: CAT 20 May 2008
G, Regina (on the Application of) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust: Admn 20 May 2008
Edmunds v Information Commissioner: IT 20 May 2008
Smith v The United Kingdom: ECHR 20 May 2008
Tomecki v Poland: ECHR 20 May 2008
Twizell v the United Kingdom: ECHR 20 May 2008
Philliskirk v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families: CST 20 May 2008
Richards v National Probation Service: Admn 29 Nov 2007
OH (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 30 Apr 2008
Ashcroft v Haberdashers Aske’s Boys School: EAT 14 Nov 2007
Taylor v East Midlands Offender Employment: EAT 20 Jul 2000
Birch, Regina v: CACD 20 Apr 2007
Regina v May and others: CACD 2005
Bristol, Regina v: CACD 4 Dec 2007
Chohanl, Regina v: CACD 6 Dec 2007
Southwell, Regina v: CACD 25 Feb 2008
Adebayo, Regina v: CACD 17 Apr 2007
Regina v Clark: CACD 9 Oct 2007
M, Regina v: CACD 20 Dec 2007

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.