Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers: 1998

(High Court of Australia ) Kirby J discussed the availability of fair comment as a defece to defamation and said that: ‘Excessive commentary or misleading headlines which amount to commentary run the risk of depriving the text of the quality of fairness essential to attract the privilege.’

Judges:

Kirby J

Citations:

(1998) 193 CLR 519

Cited by:

CitedCuristan v Times Newspapers Ltd CA 30-Apr-2008
The court considered the availability of qualified privilege for reporting of statements made in parliament and the actionable meaning of the article, which comprised in part those statements and in part other factual material representing the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Commonwealth, Defamation

Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.270511