Citations:
[1904] SLR 41 – 306
Links:
Jurisdiction:
Scotland
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609924
[1904] SLR 41 – 306
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609924
[1904] SLR 41 – 381
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609931
[1904] SLR 41 – 311
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609927
[1904] SLR 41 – 352
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609930
[1904] SLR 41 – 414
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609934
[1904] SLR 41 – 312
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609928
[1904] SLR 41 – 284
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609922
[1904] SLR 41 – 408
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609940
[1904] SLR 41 – 344
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609929
[1904] SLR 41 – 445
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609938
[1904] SLR 41 – 365
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609941
[1904] SLR 41 – 418
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609932
[1904] SLR 41 – 359 – 1
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609933
[1904] SLR 41 – 357
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609939
[1904] SLR 41 – 330
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609923
[1904] SLR 41 – 216
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609903
[1904] SLR 41 – 281
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609915
[1904] SLR 41 – 286
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609910
[1904] SLR 41 – 289
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609906
[1904] SLR 41 – 304
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609917
[1904] SLR 41 – 337
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609907
[1904] SLR 41 – 313
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609912
[1904] SLR 41 – 267
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609919
[1904] SLR 41 – 332
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609921
[1904] SLR 41 – 346
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609911
[1904] SLR 41 – 325
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609914
[1904] SLR 41 – 342
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609913
[1904] SLR 41 – 316
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609916
[1904] SLR 41 – 322
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609918
[1904] SLR 41 – 501
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609904
[1904] SLR 41 – 594
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609908
[1904] SLR 41 – 229
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609902
[1904] SLR 41 – 282
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609920
[1904] SLR 41 – 504
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609905
[1904] SLR 41 – 303
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609909
[1904] SLR 41 – 259
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609888
[1904] SLR 41 – 230
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609887
[1904] SLR 41 – 241
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609898
[1904] SLR 41 – 214
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609895
[1904] SLR 41 – 274
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609901
[1904] SLR 41 – 218
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609899
[1904] SLR 41 – 246
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609893
[1904] SLR 41 – 225
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609896
[1904] SLR 41 – 254
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609890
[1904] SLR 41 – 249
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609900
[1904] SLR 41 – 301
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609889
[1904] SLR 41 – 213
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609897
[1904] SLR 41 – 253
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609894
[1904] SLR 41 – 251
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609892
[2018] ScotCS CSOH – 32
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609364
[2018] ScotCS CSOH – 45
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609358
[2018] ScotCS CSIH – 30
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609339
[2018] ScotCS CSIH – 28
Scotland
Updated: 14 April 2022; Ref: scu.609353
The House was asked whether the conservators of the Firth of Forth were liable to income tax on revenue raised from dues levied on vessels, which revenue had to be applied to preserve and improve the appropriate part of the Firth of Forth.
Held: On previous authority, the House was constrained to hold that the conservators were liable to pay tax on the dues. A distinction was drawn between the position of rate payers and those who paid dues such as those in that case.
Lord Buckmaster
[1931] AC 540, (1931) 16 Tax Cas 103, [1930] SC 850
Scotland
Cited – Broads Authority v Fry Admn 5-Nov-2015
The boat owner had charged tolls against the respondent boat owner. He failed to pay saying that his vessel being moored at a private mooring on ‘adjacent water’ he was not liable. His appeal against his conviction had succeeded at the Crown Court, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.569405
[2015] ScotHC HCJAC – 67
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.552284
(1895) 23 R 1
Scotland
Cited – Inveresk Plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd SC 5-May-2010
The parties had undertaken the sale of a business (from I to TR) with part of the consideration to be payable on later calculation of the turnover. The agreement provided for an audit if the parties failed to agree. TR issued a figure. I argued that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.410709
[2010] ScotCS CSOH – 114
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.421617
Lord Menzies
[2010] CSOH 115, 2010 GWD 33-684, [2010] ScotCS CSOH – 115, [2011] BCC 174
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.421614
[2010] ScotCS CSOH – 113
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.421616
Lord Justice-Clerk Thomson said that if the pursuer ‘has invited a competent court to give him full satisfaction for the loss sustained by him and if he is awarded damages on that footing that is an end of it. He has got all he is entitled to.’
Lord Justice-Clerk Thomson
1959 SC 64
Cited – Heaton and Others v AXA Equity and Law Life Assurance Society plc and Another HL 25-Apr-2002
The claimant had settled one claim in full and final satisfaction against one party, but then sought further damages from the defendant, for issues related to a second but linked contract. The defendant claimed the benefit of the settlement.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.251633
Lord Clarke
Scotland
See Also – Melville Dundas Limited (In Receivership) and the Joint Receivers Thereof v George Wimpey UK Limited Norwich Union Insurance Limited OHCS 15-Dec-2005
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.218738
Sheriff Principal I.D. Macphail, Q.C.
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.218766
Sheriff Principal Sir Stephen S.T. Young
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.220632
Lord Kirkwood And Lord Penrose And Lord Wheatley
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.220080
Sheriff R.A. Davidson
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.171098
Sheriff Principal R.A. Dunlop, Q.C.
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.171078
Lord Hamilton and Lord McCluskey and Lord Justice Clerk
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170519
Lord Penrose
England and Wales
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170407
Lord Hamilton and Lord McCluskey
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170903
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom and Lord Carloway and Lord Cowie
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170686
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom and Lord Johnston and Lord Nimmo Smith and Lord Mackay of Drumadoon and Lord Justice General
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170626
Lord Cowie and Lord Osborne and Lord Sutherland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170852
Lady Cosgrove and Lady Paton and Lord Justice Clerk and Lord Marnoch and Lord Reed
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170520
Lord Cowie and Lord Milligan and Lord Sutherland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.170895
Lord Eassie
Scotland
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.169435
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom and Lord Dawson and Lord Marnoch
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.168805
Lady Cosgrove
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.168802
Lord Bonomy and Lord Eassie and Lord Justice Clerk
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.168821
Lord Bonomy
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.168921
Lord Bonomy and Lady Cosgrove and Lord President
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.168920
The petitioner golf course objected to the consent to an offshore windfarm.
Lord President
[2015] ScotCS CSIH – 46
Scotland
At Outer House – Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd and Another v The Scottish Ministers and Another SCS 17-Oct-2013
Outer House – Court of Session – This petition for judicial review challenged the decisions of the Scottish Ministers (a) not to hold a public inquiry, and (b) to grant consent under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for the construction and . .
At Outer House (2) – Trump International Gold Club Scotland Ltd and Another v The Scottish Ministers and Another SCS 11-Feb-2014
Outer House . .
At Inner House – Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd and Another v The Scottish Ministers (Scotland) SC 16-Dec-2015
The appellant challenged the grant of permission to the erection of wind turbines within sight of its golf course.
Held: The appeal failed. The challenge under section 36 was supported neither by the language or structure of the 1989 Act, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.547663
A homosexual sought an adoption order. He intended to raise the child with his male partner. The relationship was readily described as constituting a family. But as for an heterosexual couple the existence of children was not a necessary factor for entitling the couple to qualify as a family. The couple would qualify by themselves, just as they would continue to do after the adopted child had grown up and started an independent life. There was no principle against an adoption by a male homosexual to be brought up by a male couple.
Times 20-Aug-1996, 1997 SLT 724
Cited – Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd HL 28-Oct-1999
Same Sex Paartner to Inherit as Family Member
The claimant had lived with the original tenant in a stable and long standing homosexual relationship at the deceased’s flat. After the tenant’s death he sought a statutory tenancy as a spouse of the deceased. The Act had been extended to include as . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 10 April 2022; Ref: scu.89685
There should be no leave to appeal to House of Lords on an argument not advanced beforehand despite a later case.
Times 06-Mar-1995
Updated: 10 April 2022; Ref: scu.89583
Bank forced to comply with keep open clause – cash dispensers insufficient
Times 22-Apr-1996
Appeal from – Retail Parks Investments Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc (Scotland) OHCS 18-Jul-1995
Obligation to use premises as bank was enforced against a leaseholder wanting to close the business. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 10 April 2022; Ref: scu.88748
Obligation to use premises as bank was enforced against a leaseholder wanting to close the business.
Times 18-Jul-1995
Appeal from – Retail Parks Investment Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc (Scotland) IHCS 22-Apr-1996
Bank forced to comply with keep open clause – cash dispensers insufficient . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 10 April 2022; Ref: scu.88749
The divisional Court has no power to review the execution of a Scottish warrant by the police in England.
Times 10-Nov-1994, Ind Summary 09-Jan-1995
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.86414
Where the prosecution had delayed nearly four years between interview and charge, that delay was so unreasonable as to render a continuation of the prosecution a breach of the defendant’s human rights to a fair trial. The period to be considered not when the police first heard of the allegation and began to investigate, but the substitution of formal proceedings. The convention gave him the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. The prosecution could have proceeded several years earlier.
Times 14-Apr-2000
Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.85309
A contingency agreement for conduct of personal injury litigation was not a pactum de quota litis and the agreement was valid and enforceable
Times 26-Feb-1998
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.85091
The claimant had first been granted a loan from the Social Fund. After her bankruptcy, the benefits loan was recoverable from benefits even after the bankruptcy if the loan was not proved in the bankruptcy. The right to recover by deduction was but one element in the calculation of the benefit to which the claimant was entitled. There was a net entitlement.
Lord Clyde
Times 24-Nov-1995, 1996 SC 8
Appeal from – Mulvey v Secretary of State for Social Security HL 20-Mar-1997
The appellant had had repayable awards from the social fund and also income support benefit. Deductions were made from the benefit to repay the awards. Her estate was sequestrated. She argued that the awards should no longer be deducted.
Held: . .
Cited – Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne and Another SC 14-Dec-2011
The appellant sought to recover overpayments of benefits and Social Fund Loans, after the respondent had had a Debt relief order.
Held: The Secretary of State’s appeal failed. The ‘net entitlement principle’ argued for did not exist. The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.84122
(Scot) Judicial review was proper for a challenge to an expulsion from a university.
Times 05-Aug-1993
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.84160
UK validly made contributions to European Social policy costs.
Times 12-May-1994
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.83800
A person appointed by the court to act as reporter to the court exercised a statutory function. He had trained and qualified as a solicitor, but then had his name removed from the roll. He used his legal skills in his practice and it was asserted that he was acting as a solicitor. Although there are elements of practice, the matter was not decided by what he did whilst carrying out his job, but his status. Reporters did not necessarily have legal qualifications and there was no necessary inference that he was so acting.
Times 22-Mar-2000
Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.83724
The creditor finance company complained that the customer had paid money into its account with the bank, in order to discharge its obligations by direct debit payments, but that the bank had refused to make the payments. The claimant argued that the direct debit mandate was a mandate in rem suam, and was not dependant upon a credit balance to be maintained.
Held: The respective rights as between a banker and his customer are not affected by direct debit instructions. The instruction to pay remained that of the account holder. The creditor was in the same position as was the payee on a cheque, namely that it was a prerequisitie of an assignative effect that the account should crry sufficient funds. Though there were no relevant averments of trust or of a fiduciary relationship, the bank’s knowledgeof the specific reason for the lodgment of the funds to meet a specific obligation might be enough to require proof to be heard on the claim for unjust enrichment.
Lord Penrose
Times 16-Sep-1996, 1996 SCLR 1005
Cited – British Motor Trade Association v Gray 1951
The test for an allegation of wrongful interference in a contract required something more than a failure to act. . .
Cited – Sutherland v Royal Bank of Scotland 1996
. .
Cited – Clark Taylor and Company v Quality Site Development (Edinburgh) Limited 1981
It was claimed that a trust had come into being in circumstances where the alleged truster and the alleged trustee were the same person.
Held: It was competent for the claimant to be both truster and trustee. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.83646
English law had been correctly applied in GMC disciplinary proceedings even though they were heard in Scotland.
Gazette 03-Feb-1993, [1993] AC 388
Cited – Sadler v The General Medical Council PC 15-Jul-2003
(The Committee on Professional Performance of the GMC) The distinction drawn in Krippendorf between a practitioner’s current competence and past performance was not to be taken too far. The purpose of the assessment was not to punish the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.83490
Where a statute has several purposes the sections must be construed individually.
Times 20-May-1994
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.83493