Byers and Others v Samba Financial Group (230): ChD 15 Jan 2021

Reasons for grant of leave to appeal

Judges:

Fancourt J

Citations:

[2021] EWHC 230 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoByers and Others v Samba Financial Group ChD 20-Dec-2019
Application by the defendant issued for an extension of the date by which the defendant was required to give standard disclosure. . .
See AlsoByers and Others v Samba Financial Group ChD 8-Apr-2020
. .
See AlsoByers and Others v Samba Financial Group ChD 24-Apr-2020
. .
See AlsoByers and Others v Samba Financial Group ChD 2-Oct-2020
. .

Cited by:

See AlsoByers and Others v Samba Financial Group (60) ChD 15-Jan-2021
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Torts – Other, Registered Land

Updated: 22 September 2022; Ref: scu.658049

Themeplace Ltd v Almula (Contracts and Options): FTTPC 15 Jul 2019

Application by Respondent to cancel unilateral notices on titles to 4 houses. Applicant claimed a contract of sale bound the Respondent’s titles. The issue was whether the contract had been rescinded by the Respondent. Held that the Respondent had validly served a notice to complete because he was ready able and willing to complete at the date of service. He was able to give vacant possession notwithstanding that a third party had parked his van on the site on the day of service. The title was not incumbered by third parties having made an unestablished claim to a right to park on the land. The failure of the Applicant to complete on the date specified in the notice was a repudiatory breach. The Respondent had accepted that breach and rescinded by notice served on the Applicant. The unilateral notice was to be removed.

Citations:

[2019] UKFTT 506 (PC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.645400

Courtney v Cobb, Quinney (Easements and Profits A Prendre : Interruption): LRA 8 Feb 2011

LRA Right of way over roadside verge; Prescription Act 1832; doctrine of Lost Modern Grant; extent of right of way acquired by user; does right of way extend to vehicular use; is right of way limited to agricultural purposes only; whether use post January 1999 continued to be as of right.

Citations:

[2011] EWLandRA 2009 – 1434

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Prescription Act 1832

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land, Land

Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.517429

Pinto v Lim: ChD 19 Apr 2005

The parties had been owners of a property. The defendant was thought to have forged a transfer of the house into her sole name, and then sold on the property to her brother, who was innocent of the forgery. The claimant, on returning to England sought rectification of the register.
Held: The fact that a forgery had taken place was not conclusive to decide the issue. It was not the case that rectification should be ordered only where it would be unjust not to. The fact of possession was significant, but not so that the fact of possession was decisive either. There were two innocent parties, and one would be entitled to an indemnity. The value of the property had increased substantially since the transaction, Mr Lim was in possession of the property, and the value of the claimant’s share in the property at the time was small. Recification against the defendant was refused.

Judges:

Blackburne J

Citations:

Times 08-Jun-2005, [2005] EWHC 630 (Ch)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedKingsalton Ltd and Another v Thames Water Developments Ltd and Others ChD 19-Jan-2001
The fact of possession of land by the registered proprietor was a factor to be given special effect when a court considered an application to rectify the register. The presumptions following from the registration of the land with title absolute, . .

Cited by:

CitedGold Harp Properties Ltd v Macleod and Others CA 29-Jul-2014
The company appealed against an order re-instating to the register leases which the company said it had forfeited for non-payment of rent. After the forfeiture, the landlord had granted new leases. It appealed saying that exceptional circumstances . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 14 September 2022; Ref: scu.226036

Balevents Ltd v Sartori: ChD 29 Sep 2011

A strip of land had at one point been left aside for an anticipated road widening which never took place. The defendant had eventually obtained a registered possessory title to it. The claimant, owner of a neighbouring plot, now challenged that title and the truth of the statutory declarations which achieved it.
Held: The claim failed. The manner of occupation by the defendant’s predecessors, in the stationing of a mobile cafe on the land, never amounted to taking possession of it. The cafe remained mobile, never being fixed, and the chairs etc were tidied away at night, and the claimant’s predecessors used the land as licencees of the defendant. The land came to be fenced in only later. The claimant had itself financed the defendant’s application for the title. In conclusion, of the last ten years preceding the application the defendant had been in adverse possession.

Judges:

Kitchin J

Citations:

[2011] EWHC 2437 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedPowell v McFarlane ChD 1977
Intention to Establish Adverse Possession of Land
A squatter had occupied the land and defended a claim for possession. The court discussed the conditions necessary to establish an intention to possess land adversely to the paper owner.
Held: Slade J said: ‘It will be convenient to begin by . .
CitedJ A Pye (Oxford) Ltd and Others v Graham and Another HL 4-Jul-2002
The claimants sought ownership by adverse possession of land. Once the paper owner had been found, they indicated a readiness to purchase their interest. The court had found that this letter contradicted an animus possidendi. The claimant had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 10 September 2022; Ref: scu.444781

Morris v Rae: SCS 5 Apr 2011

The complainer had purchased land from the defender, but the Keeper of the Registers refused to register the transfer, saying that the disponer was not the owner. The claim was for breach of warrandice.

Judges:

Lord Clarke

Citations:

[2011] ScotCS CSIH – 30, 2011 SCLR 428, 2011 SLT 701, 2011 GWD 13-305, [2011] CSIH 30

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

CitedClark v Lindale Homes Limited SCS 1994
The court set out the conditions to found a claim for breach of warrandice on a land purchase: ‘Although eviction did not mean physical removal, it did involve the emergence of a real or threatened burden on the property which had to come from a . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromMorris v Rae SC 7-Nov-2012
The pursuer had bought land from the responder which in turn had bought from a company now in liquidation. On application for registration, the Keepr of the registers said the title had not been made out, and he was unable to complete the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Scotland, Registered Land

Updated: 06 September 2022; Ref: scu.431766

Christopher Brian White and Beverley Jane Byrne v Christopher Gordon Walker and Janet Gay Walker (Easements): LRA 27 Jul 2009

LRA Easement ‘to enter upon the premises . . and to draw water from the well situate thereon’ held to give right of entry only in connection with the right to draw water from the well. Right not abandoned simply because well was filled in once a mains water supply had been provided to both properties

Citations:

[2009] EWLandRA 2008 – 1430

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429619

The Mayor and Burgesses of The London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Barrett: LRA 4 Feb 2009

LRA Former highways and the medium filum rule – acquisition of an easement for parking – Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s2 – Law of Property Act 1925 s62 – Local Government Act 1972, s 132(2A) – Local Government Organisation (Property) Order 1986 – Stopping-Up of Highways (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) (No. 4) Order 1983 – the Abercrombie Report 1944.

Citations:

[2009] EWLandRA 2005 – 0270

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429610

Mary Clementine Allen v Norma Marion Higson (Easements): LRA 11 Apr 2008

LRA Owner of two adjoining properties sells one of them. Access from the side door of the retained property to the highway involved crossing a very small open area of the property sold. Implied reservation of right of way over that area established on the facts.

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2006 – 1621

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429594

Natalie Hedges v Mayland Parish Council (Adverse Possession): LRA 29 Jan 2009

LRA Possessory title claim. Strip of land enclosed as part of garden under licence. Effect on licence of change of owner of the garden and on sale of the strip of land. Owner of strip informs new licensee of transfer of title and tells licensee to pay licence fee to new owner, but new owner does not communicate with licensee and no fee is paid for 17 years. Claim that the old licence survived or that a new licence was to be implied is rejected. Authorities reviewed.

Citations:

[2009] EWLandRA 2008 – 0088

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429608

Great Parndon Investments Limited v Winifred Omoyiola Oyeleye (Adverse Possession): LRA 8 Sep 2008

LRA Adverse possession. Vendor dies before completion. Contractual purchaser breaks into property, changes the locks, develops and lets it. Time runs for the purpose of adverse possession from the date possession is taken by the contractual purchaser. Hyde v Pearce, [1982] 1 All ER 1029, distinguished.

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2005 – 1864

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429601

The Republic of Croatia v The Republic of Serbia (Other): LRA 3 Dec 2008

LRA Dismemberment of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; entry of restrictions; lex situs; private domestic law of England and Wales; occupation of property by a member of the Serbian diplomatic mission; principle of justiciability; ‘sufficient interest’; ‘right or claim’; Agreement on Succession Issues 2001 2262 (United Nations Treaty Series 253), Articles 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8, Annex B, Articles 2,3,4 and 5; United Kingdom Material on International Law (1996) 67 BYIL 708 – 709

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2008 – 0076

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429605

Jan Whitehurst, Susan Elizabeth Whitehurst, Richard Leslie Whitehurst, Victoria Jayne O’ Donnell v Malcolm Dickinson (Adverse Possession): LRA 27 Jul 2009

LRA Applicants and their predecessors were in possession of the disputed land for 45 years or more without consent – Application to register Applicants as proprietors on the basis of adverse possession – The land in question formed part of a common subject to a 1915 management scheme made under the Commons Act 1899 – Adverse possession of such land is possible, although subject to the rights under the scheme, unless such rights are capable of abandonment and have been abandoned (which it was unnecessary to decide) – Section 194 of the Law of Property Act 1925 did not apply as no evidence that land was subject to rights of common on 1 January 1926 – Written acknowledgment of owner’s title irrelevant, as it was after the expiry of the limitation period – Application succeeded

Citations:

[2009] EWLandRA 2008 – 0315

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429617

Michael Walton v Kerguelen Investments Limited (Practice and Procedure): LRA 22 Dec 2008

LRA KEYWORDS – Adverse possession claim – Schedule 6 to the Land Registration Act 2002 – effect of Sections 96 and 97 of the 2002 Act – acknowledgment of title – Section 29 of the Limitation Act 1980 – Without prejudice’ correspondence – whether privileged – alleged perjury

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2008 – 0321

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Land Registration Act 2002 96 97 Sch 6, Limitation Act 1980 29

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429604

David Alexander Rogers, Lucy Alexandra Rogers v Penelope Jane Margaret Thompson (Other): LRA 8 Sep 2008

LRA Application pursuant to section 41(1) of the Land Registration Act 2002 to have a restriction disapplied. Consideration of terms upon which it would be appropriate for it to be disapplied in all the circumstances.

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2007 – 0880

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Land Registration Act 2002 41(1)

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429600

Fatemi-Ardakani v Taheri, Fatemi-Ardakani (Deeds : Powers of Attorney): LRA 18 Sep 2007

LRA Validity of transfer – whether donee of power of attorney can sign a deed in his own name – authority required – whether transfer must indicate that he is so signing – effect of failure to comply with Rule 82 of the Land Registration Rules 2003 – Powers of Attorney Act 1971 ss 7 and 10 – Frontin v Small (1790 2 Lord Raym 1417, White v Cuyler (1795) 6 T.R 176, Wilkes v Back (1802) 2 East 142, Combes’ Case (1613) 9 Co. Rep 75a

Citations:

[2007] EWLandRA 2006 – 1313

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429574

Ajibade v Bank of Scotland Plc (Formerly Halifax Plc), Endeavour Personal Finance Limited (Alteration and Rectification of The Register): LRA 8 Apr 2008

LRA Rectification of the register – Fraud – ‘Correcting a mistake’ – second charge – Schedule 4 Paragraph 5(1)(a) of the Land Registration Act 2002
Ms Ajibade was the registered proprietor of a leasehold flat. Her sister forged a power of attorney in her own favour and in the purported exercise of that power transferred the property to a Mr Abiola (her husband). Mr Abiola took out a mortgage from the Halifax Building Society (which became part of the Bank of Scotland), and he subsequently took a further loan from a company called Endeavour; both loans were charged on the property and duly registered on the Charges Register. Mr Abiola did not oppose the rectification of the Proprietorship Register by removing him as registered proprietor. As regards the chargees, the Bank of Scotland apparently accepted that it followed that its charge also would have to be removed from the Charges Register; but Endeavour took a different line. As summarised by Mr Rhys: ‘It contends that whether or not the transfer in favour of Mr Abiola was a nullity, its second charge must remain on the register, even if the Applicant succeeds in having herself restored as proprietor. Essentially, it contends that Mr Abiola, once registered as proprietor, albeit by virtue of a fraudulent transaction, was entitled to charge the property to Endeavour, and consequently there is no ‘mistake’ within the meaning of Schedule 4 Paragraph 5 to relieve against.’
The bank relied in particular on the view expressed in Ruoff and Roper that a narrow view of the concept of ‘correcting a mistake’ should be adopted.
Mr Rhys rejected that argument: ‘In one sense, the arguments addressed to me by both the Applicant and Endeavour have been focussed on the wrong word – namely ‘mistake’. The Applicant contends that the registration of Endeavour is, in effect, a mistake. Endeavour contends that is not. However, it is manifest, and not disputed, that there was an operative mistake when the Land Registry registered Mr Abiola as proprietor of the Property. The real question, it seems to me, is to decide how far the registrar can go in ‘correcting’ that mistake. It is accepted that Mr Abiola should be removed from the register and the Applicant replaced as proprietor in the Proprietorship Register. It is also accepted that Halifax Plc should be removed from the Charges Register. Would these steps entirely correct the original mistake? The Property would still remain subject to the second charge created by the fraudulently-registered Mr Abiola, and the Applicant would regain her title but encumbered by this charge. It does not seem to me that, in such circumstances, the mistake has been fully corrected. Certainly, all the consequences of the mistake would not have been corrected, even though it would be open to the registrar to do so by rectifying the Charges Register by removing Endeavour’s charge. In my judgment, there is no basis for construing the expression ‘correcting a mistake’ in such a restrictive way. It seems to me that this formulation is intended to give the registrar wide scope to exercise the discretion to rectify in a fair and just way. It would have been possible to have imposed express limitations on the power in the sense contended for by Endeavour if this had been the intention – as indeed limitations have been imposed in regard to proprietors in possession (see Schedule 4 Paragraph 6). It seems to me that it would be perverse to limit the registrar’s power to rectify the register to the correction of only one consequence of the mistake, leaving uncorrected the other direct consequences of the original mistake. Protection for parties in the position of Endeavour is to be found both in the undoubted requirement that the registrar should exercise his power in a fair and just way, and in the existence of an indemnity from the Land Registry.’ He considered whether his approach went too far in undermining the ‘sanctity’ of the Register; but he believed that it did not. In that connection he noted that his conclusion was in line with the position under the 1925 Act and referred to Argyle Building Society v Hammond.

Judges:

Mr Rhys

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2006 – 0163

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Land Registration Act 2002

Citing:

See AlsoAjibade v Bank of Scotland Plc (Formerly Halifax Plc), Endeavour Personal Finance Ltd LRA 8-Apr-2008
LRA Alteration and Rectification of The Register : Discretion of The Registrar and of The Adjudicator – Rectification of the register – Fraud – ‘Correcting a mistake’ – second charge – Schedule 4 Paragraph . .

Cited by:

CitedGold Harp Properties Ltd v Macleod and Others CA 29-Jul-2014
The company appealed against an order re-instating to the register leases which the company said it had forfeited for non-payment of rent. After the forfeiture, the landlord had granted new leases. It appealed saying that exceptional circumstances . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429592

Arnold and Arnold v Roughton Land Trust Musker and Musker, (Practice and Procedure): LRA 5 Nov 2007

LRA Adverse possession – locus standi of a person not having an interest in the land – adding new parties – holding a substantive hearing in absence of a party – Limitation Act 1980 Section 15; Schedule 1, paragraphs 1 and 8 – Land Registration Act 2002 Schedule 4; Adjudicator to Her Majesty’s Land Registry (Practice and Procedure) Rules 2003 Rule 2; Rule 24 (1)(a); Part 5, Rule 33(1); Rule 38; Rule 38(1)(a)(i);

Citations:

[2007] EWLandRA 2006 – 0865

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429577

London Borough of Wandsworth v Rapose, Rapose, Rapose, De Souza, Rapose, Gracias, Haq, Scullion: LRA 1 Apr 2008

Compulsory purchase

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2007 – 0167

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Compulsory Purchase (Vesting Declarations) Act 1981 3 4 5 6 9, Acquisition of Land Act 1981 5 11 12 13A 15 23, Compulsory Purchase of Land (Vesting Declarations) Regulations 1990, Compulsory Purchase by Non-Ministerial Acquiring Authorities (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 1990, Adjudicator to HM Land Registry (Practice and Procedure) Rules 2003 31, Land Registration Act 2002 3 4(1)(a)(i) 29(2)(a)(ii) 30(2)(a)(ii)

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429593

John Taylor, Julie Wicks v Richard Ball (Beneficial Interests and Trust): LRA 25 Apr 2008

LRA Application to enter a restriction – property purchased with benefit of right to buy discount – whether held on constructive or resulting trust – effect of discount – Chief Land Registrar ordered to give effect to restriction

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2006 – 0882

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429589

Deem v Dorset County Council (Adverse Possession): LRA 25 Jan 2008

LRA Application for first registration based on adverse possession – whether adverse possession established – whether land part of highway – hedge to hedge presumption – London Borough of Bromley v Morritt (1999) 78 PandCR D 37 – J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2003] 1 AC 419 – Hale v Norfolk County Council [2001] Ch 717 – Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Bexley v Maison Maurice Chief Land Registrar ordered to give effect to application as if no objection had been made

Citations:

[2008] EWLandRA 2005 – 1051

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429583

Meldale Limited v Ludgershall Parish Council (Easements): LRA 27 Sep 2007

LRA Right of way acquired by prescription – doctrine of lost modern grant – whether acquired for all purposes or limited to agricultural purposes only – whether abandoned – Ludgershall Inclosure Act 1777 – Ludgershall Inclosure Award 1778 -Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, section 67(5) – Inclosure Act 1857, section 12 – Commons Act 1876, section 29

Citations:

[2007] EWLandRA 2005 – 2006

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429573

Michael Rubinow v Misbah Uddin, Milena Corbic-Brennan (Beneficial Interests and Trust): LRA 20 Nov 2006

LRA Beneficial Interests and Trust – Constructive trust – proprietary estoppel – whether Applicant entitled to retain caution – whether transfer from Second to First Respondent should be registered. Chief Land Registrar ordered to cancel caution and register transfer.

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2004 – 1226

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429555

Derbyshire County Council v Glen Neil Fallon and Tracy Jane Fallon (Boundary Dispute): LRA 23 Nov 2006

LRA Boundary dispute – general boundaries rule – whether alteration of line of general boundary affects the title of a proprietor of a registered estate in relation to adjoining land in his possession – an application to the Chief Land Registrar to correct a mistake on the registered plan as to the boundary is generally inappropriate when the disputed land has been built upon by the adjoining owner until a court has decided whether to grant damages or an injunction against the adjoining owner.

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2005 – 0106

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429552

Maureen Janice Waghorn v Steven Albert Andrew Waghorn (Beneficial Interests and Trust): LRA 2 Nov 2006

LRA Beneficial Interests and Trust – Proprietary estoppel – adult son working in family business with father and uncle – alleged promise of a small garage from which he could carry on own business as well as assist in family business – factual issues arising as to whether promise made, reliance and detriment – was it unconscionable for the promissors’ successor not to transfer the freehold to the adult son almost 30 years later.

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2006 – 0271

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429554

The Trustees for Methodist Church Purposes v George William Child (Beneficial Interests and Trust): LRA 23 Nov 2006

LRA Beneficial Interests and Trust – Adverse possession – charitable settlement of land in 1880 – settlement not enrolled in the High Court and subject to reverter to the settlor if land built on – Mortmain Act 1736 – is the settlement void? – if so have the trustees under the settlement been in adverse possession of the land?

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2005 – 1604

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Mortmain Act 1736

Registered Land, Charity

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429556

Robert Henry Merrifield v Wilfred Swan (Personal Representative of Matthew William Carter Swan) (Adverse Possession): LRA 13 Oct 2006

Possessory title of registered land – necessary intention on the part of the occupier – what amounts to adverse possession under paragraph 1 of Schedule 6 to the Land Registration Act 2002 – effect of a failure by the paper owner to require an application to be dealt with under paragraph 5 of Schedule 6

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2005 – 1229

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429551

Aristotelis Kleanthous, Sofoulla Kleanthous v The London Borough of Barnet (Adverse Possession): LRA 8 Dec 2006

LRA Adverse possession – whether user permissive – whether factual possession and intention to possess established – whether title was acknowledged under ss 29 and 30 of the Limitation Act 1980 – effect of squatter being secure tenant and subsequently exercising right to buy – J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2003] 1 AC 419; Tower Hamlets v Barrett [2006] 1 PandCR 9

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2005 – 1168

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429557

Thompson and Thompson v Hatherton Marina Limited: LRA 11 May 2007

LRA Adverse Possession – Registration with possessory freehold title – Limitation of action – Alteration of the register – Meaning of alteration and rectification – Land Registration Act 2002 s 9(1)(c),(5), s 11(7), s 65, s 131, Sch 4 paras 1, 5, and 6 – Limitation Act 1980 s 15(1), (6), s 17, Sch.1, paras 1, 8 – Law of Property Act 1925 s 62 – Use by adjoining owners of a strip of land next to a canal for their business – Whether factual possession and intention to possess

Judges:

Cousins A

Citations:

[2007] EWLandRA 2004 – 0765

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429567

Jane Hamilton Holland v John Stephen Bate (Easements): LRA 20 Nov 2006

LRA Private road – formerly part of an estate which had been split up – claim by registered proprietor of land on both sides of part of the road to ownership of that part – construction of earlier conveyances – ad medium filum presumption – adverse possession – Was that part of the road subject to a right of way?

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2005 – 1307

Links:

Bailii

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429553

J C Decaux Ltd v Kwik Save Stores Ltd (Adverse Possession): LRA 23 Jun 2006

Land Registration Act 1925 section 75 – Limitation Act 1980 section 15 and Sch 1 Para 8(4) – Adverse possession – Agreement – Lease or Licence – Whether consent given by paper owner – Whether squatter had intention to possess – Adverse possession not made out – Application dismissed

Citations:

[2006] EWLandRA 2004 – 1242

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Land Registration Act 1925 75, Limitation Act 1980 15

Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.429543

Pritchard Englefield v Steinberg and Steinberg: ChD 30 Jul 2004

Enforcement of charging order absolute.

Judges:

The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Smith

Citations:

[2004] EWHC 1908 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedWilliams and Glyn’s Bank Ltd v Boland HL 19-Jun-1980
Wife in Occupation had Overriding Interest
The wife had made a substantial financial contribution to the purchase price of the house which was registered only in her husband’s name, and charged to the bank. The bank sought possession. The wife resisted saying that she had an overriding . .
See AlsoEnglefield and Another v Steinberg CA 26-Mar-2001
Application for leave to appeal out of time against an interim order in defamation claim.
Held: The defendant had not shown any good cause for setting the judge’s case management directions aside, nor that he should recuse himself. . .
See AlsoPritchard Englefield (A Firm) and Another v Steinberg SCCO 27-Mar-2003
. .
See AlsoSteinberg v Pritchard Englefield (A Firm) and Another QBD 18-Jun-2003
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice, Registered Land

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.199820

UCB Group Ltd v Gillian Hedworth: CA 24 May 2002

The claimant was a registered chargee of the property. The respondent claimed an overriding interest. The registered proprietor held the land under a bare trust for the defendant, paying her a weekly rent. She was not in occupation. She had registered a caution.
Held: The caution had been properly discharged. A beneficial interest under a bare trust of registered land was a minor interest and not a registrable estate, and could be protected by a restriction only, and rent paid out under such a trust did not ‘issue’ out of the land and was not an overriding interest.

Judges:

Lord Justice Johnathan Parker

Citations:

Times 13-Jun-2002, Gazette 04-Jul-2002, [2002] EWCA Civ 708

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Registered Land Act 1925 2(1) 70(1)(g)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land, Trusts

Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.171269

Wilson and Another v Grainger: ChD 4 Dec 2009

The claimants appealed against a decision of the Adjudicator that they had not acquired a piece of their neighbour’s land by adverse possession, on the basis that their use had been by virtue of an oral licence. The judge had found the occupation to be insufficient to demnstrate exclusion of others from the land.
Held: The appeal failed. The issue was whether the acts of possession asserted constituted a sufficient degree of exclusive control, and was not whether the claimants had done everything they might be expected to do. That was the test applied by the Adjudicator. The factual conclusions were justified on the evidence.

Judges:

Vos J

Citations:

[2009] EWHC 3145 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Land Registration Act 2002, Limitation Act 1980 15(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedPowell v McFarlane ChD 1977
Intention to Establish Adverse Possession of Land
A squatter had occupied the land and defended a claim for possession. The court discussed the conditions necessary to establish an intention to possess land adversely to the paper owner.
Held: Slade J said: ‘It will be convenient to begin by . .
CitedJ A Pye (Oxford) Ltd and Others v Graham and Another HL 4-Jul-2002
The claimants sought ownership by adverse possession of land. Once the paper owner had been found, they indicated a readiness to purchase their interest. The court had found that this letter contradicted an animus possidendi. The claimant had . .
CitedIn re H and R (Minors) (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) HL 14-Dec-1995
Evidence allowed – Care Application after Abuse
Children had made allegations of serious sexual abuse against their step-father. He was acquitted at trial, but the local authority went ahead with care proceedings. The parents appealed against a finding that a likely risk to the children had still . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 29 August 2022; Ref: scu.384069

Guy v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 8 Dec 2010

In an earlier action the claimant said that he had been defraused of land by a forged transfer. The transfereee had charged the land to the respondent bank who in that action gained a decision that its charge was effective, the transfer being voidable, not void. He sought to bring a new action.
Held: The application did not fall with Taylor v Lawrence, and must fail.
Lord Neuberger MR did not consider the merits, but said: ‘It . . seems clear that Lloyd LJ’s analysis proceeded on the basis that the alleged ‘mistake’ for the purposes of para 2(1) of schedule 4 to the 2002 Act was the registration of the Charge in the charges registers. However, there are other ways of putting Mr Guy’s case, namely (a) that the removal of his name from the proprietorship register was a mistake, and, in order to correct that mistake, the Charge would have to be removed from the charges register, or (b) that the registration of the Charge flowed from the mistake of registering the Transfer, and therefore should be treated as part and parcel of that mistake.’

Judges:

Lord Neuberger MR, Patten, Black LLJ

Citations:

[2010] EWCA Civ 1396

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoBarclays Bank Plc v Guy ChD 16-Jan-2008
The defendant owned development land in Manchester. Under a transfer apparently signed by him the land came to be registered in the name of a company called Ten Acre Ltd, creating a charge in favour of Barclays Bank, which was duly registered on the . .
See AlsoBarclays Bank Plc v Guy CA 9-Apr-2008
The bank had sought and obtained an order recognising the vaidity of its charge over the land. The land had belonged to the defendant, but he said that the property had been registered by a fraudulen ttransfer, and charged by the transferee in the . .
CitedTaylor v Lawrence CA 4-Feb-2002
A party sought to re-open a judgment on the Court of Appeal after it had been perfected. A case had been tried before a judge. One party had asked for a different judge to be appointed, after the judge disclosed that he had been a client of the firm . .

Cited by:

CitedGold Harp Properties Ltd v Macleod and Others CA 29-Jul-2014
The company appealed against an order re-instating to the register leases which the company said it had forfeited for non-payment of rent. After the forfeiture, the landlord had granted new leases. It appealed saying that exceptional circumstances . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Banking, Registered Land

Updated: 28 August 2022; Ref: scu.426903

Semple v Anthony and Anthony (Evidence): LRA 13 Jan 2012

LRA Determined Boundary – whether title plans determinative of the boundary between car-parking spaces – whether extrinsic evidence admissible as an aid to the construction of the transfers – whether the intention of the parties to the original transfer is admissible evidence.

Citations:

[2012] EWLandRA 2011 – 0522

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedWebb v Nightingale CA 8-Mar-1957
A boundary line which the parties had agreed and marked out could supersede a plan on a conveyance expressly said to be for identification only. Lord Denning: ‘It seems to me that the line of white stakes with the white peg in the south-east corner . .
CitedWillson v Greene (Moss third party) ChD 1971
The court could take into account objective surrounding circumstances indicating where the boundary line had been agreed and marked out by the parties. Thus extrinsic evidence of where the land was identified by pegs was admissible and the extrinsic . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 19 August 2022; Ref: scu.510149

Rees v The National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or National Beauty: LRA 5 Mar 2007

Boundary Dispute

Citations:

[2007] EWLandRA 2005 – 1838

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedStephenson and Another v Johnson and Another CA 12-Jul-2000
There had been a dispute as to the correct boundary between two properties in North Yorkshire. The land had been in common ownership until 1973. The 1973 conveyance showed the boundary in a position which the claimants said was determinative. The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 19 August 2022; Ref: scu.429564

Calgary and Edmonton Land Co Ltd v Discount Bank (Overseas) Ltd: ChD 1971

Cautions had been registered against land to protect interests claimed in a pending action. The action had been struck out at first instance, an appeal to the Court of Appeal had failed but a petition for leave to appeal to the House of Lords was still pending.
Held: On an interlocutory notice of motion Brightman J ordered that the register be rectified by vacating the cautions. He had power to make the order either under paragraph (a) or under paragraph (b) and that ‘it matters not whether the order is expressly made under paragraph (a) or paragraph (b).’

Judges:

Brightman J

Citations:

[1971] 1 WLR 81

Statutes:

Land Registration Act 1925 82 83

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedNugent v Nugent ChD 20-Dec-2013
The court was asked whether the court has, following the the 2002 Act, an inherent power to order the cancellation of a unilateral notice registered against a title registered under the 2002 Act and, if so, in what circumstances, and how, such a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 16 August 2022; Ref: scu.519754

Peffer v Rigg and Another: ChD 17 Mar 1976

The court was asked as to the protection given by the 1925 Act to a purchaser, defined as one taking in good faith for valuable consideration.
Held: A purchaser ‘cannot in my judgment be in good faith if he has in fact notice of something which affects his title’.

Judges:

Graham J

Citations:

(1976) 242 EG 123, [1978] 3 All ER 745, [1977] 1 WLR 285, [1976] EWHC Ch 1

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Land Registration Act 1925

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Strongly criticisedChaudhary v Yavuz CA 22-Nov-2011
The court was asked ‘whether and if so how an easement arising informally and not protected by any entry at the Land Registry can be effective against a purchaser of the land over which the easement would be exercised.’ The parties respectively . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 16 August 2022; Ref: scu.245429

Raymere Ltd v Belle Vue Gardens Ltd: CA 17 Jul 2003

Tenants of a block of flats sought enfranchisement. The landlord said the notices were defective in that the office copies supplied did not show the entitlement of the persons giving notice at the relevant time.
Held: The scheme for collective enfranchisement must apply with equal rigour to unregistered and registered land. The consequence of non-compliance with a section 20 notice is that no further initial notice can be given in respect of the same premises for another twelve months. That indicates that the requirement to deduce title is more an administrative or procedural requirement than a requirement to prove conclusively that the tenant has a good title in law as at the relevant date. Less than perfect compliance should not defeat a notice.

Judges:

Lord Justice Brooke, Lord Justice Jonathan Parker And Mr Justice Holman

Citations:

[2003] EWCA Civ 996, Times 14-Aug-2003

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 20, Leasehold Reform (Collective Enfranchisement and Lease Renewal) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/2407) 2, Land Registration Act 1925 110(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

AppliedBurman v Mount Cook Land Ltd CA 20-Nov-2001
The tenant occupied a flat under a long lease at a low rent. She was entitled to acquire the freehold on payment of a premium and after following the procedure under the Act. The landlord served a purported counter notice which did not state in . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant, Registered Land

Updated: 06 August 2022; Ref: scu.184620

Harris v Williams-Wynne: ChD 11 Feb 2005

The parties agreed in sale agreement for a plot of land that the buyer would not erect any additional building. He did so, and when he came to try to sell it the original vendor objected. The purchaser’s solicitors registered the agreement for sale. He said that the defendant had impliedly supported his actions and could not now object. The defendant refused to provide a transfer to complete, and the claimant sought specific performance and damages.
Held: The court preferred the defendant’s evidence. A person’s behaviour will not usually be regarded as having been unconscionable unless it has had also an effect on the other person and caused him to act to his detriment. The covenant here went beyond approval of plans to an outright right to prohibit. The claimant’s delay did not oust his right to damages. However he had himself caused damage by not completing the sale, linking this to the breach of covenant, and was liable for such.

Judges:

Bernard Livesey QC

Citations:

[2005] EWHC 151 (CH)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Chancery Amendment Act 1858 2

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedSurrey County Council v Bredero Homes Ltd CA 7-Apr-1993
A local authority had sold surplus land to a developer and obtained a covenant that the developer would develop the land in accordance with an existing planning permission. The sole purpose of the local authority in imposing the covenant was to . .
CitedWrotham Park Estate Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd ChD 1974
55 houses had been built by the defendant, knowingly in breach of a restrictive covenant, imposed for the benefit of an estate, and in the face of objections by the claimant.
Held: The restrictive covenant not to develop other than in . .
CitedShaw v Applegate CA 1977
There was a covenant against the use of a property as an amusement arcade. Within three years the purchaser had installed amusement machines, but it was not until three years later that the plaintiffs issued proceedings for an injunction and . .
CitedHabib Bank Ltd v Habib Bank AG Zurich CA 1981
A combination of defences based on delay was pleaded in a passing off action objecting to the use of a name which the defendants had been using without objection for many years. A permanent injunction was claimed.
Held: Oliver LJ said as to . .
CitedO’Brien Homes Limited v Lane 5-Feb-2004
The court at first instance had considered what to award by way of damages for breach of a restrictive covenant and set a sum of pounds 150,000 out of an anticipated profit of pounds 280,000.
Held: The calculation of the gross profit might be . .
CitedJaggard v Sawyer and Another CA 18-Jul-1994
Recovery of damages after Refusal of Injunction
The plaintiff appealed against the award of damages instead of an injunction aftter the County court had found the defendant to have trespassed on his land by a new building making use of a private right of way.
Held: The appeal failed.
CitedAmec Developments Limited v Jury’s Hotel Management (UK) Limited 2001
A hotel had been built so as to encroach across a building line in breach of covenant, allowing the hotel to have 25 more rooms than it would otherwise have enjoyed. The court considered conflicting evidence as to the capital value of the additional . .
CitedHM Attorney General v Blake (Jonathan Cape Ltd third Party intervening) HL 3-Aug-2000
Restitutionary Claim against Pofits from Breach
The author had written his book in breach of his duty of confidence. Having signed the Official Secrets Act, he accepted a contractual private law duty. After conviction as a spy, the publication of the book was in breach of the undertaking by not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land, Registered Land

Updated: 06 August 2022; Ref: scu.222984

James Hay Pension Trustees Ltd v Cooper Estates Ltd: ChD 20 Jan 2005

The court ordered rectification of the land register where not to do so would give the then registered proprietor an unattractive and uncovenanted ransom position.

Citations:

[2005] EWHC 36 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedSainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Olympia Homes Limited, Hughes etc ChD 17-Jun-2005
The claimant sought rectification of the land register. In a development deal, an option agreement had not been registered, and the land sold on. The land was required to allow the building of a roundabout necessary for the intended store. An . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land, Registered Land

Updated: 06 August 2022; Ref: scu.222659

Barons Finance Ltd., Regina (on The Application of) v Chief Land Registrar: Admn 17 Feb 2010

Renewed application for permission to bring judicial review proceedings on behalf of Barons Finance Limited against the Chief Land Registrar as to decisions to remove and to cancel a unilateral notice registered against a title.

Judges:

Simon J

Citations:

[2010] EWHC 1088 (Admin)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Registered Land

Updated: 03 August 2022; Ref: scu.431927