NIIT The tribunal finds that the claimant did not suffer discrimination on the grounds of sex or her part-time working status and accordingly her claims are dismissed.
Judges:
Mr B Greene
Citations:
[2009] NIIT 7 – 08IT
Links:
Statutes:
Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1976, Part-time Workers (Provision of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000
Citing:
Cited – Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 1) HL 3-Mar-1993
Questions on pregnancy dismissals included unavailability at required time. The correct comparison under the Act of 1975 was between the pregnant woman and: ‘a hypothetical man who would also be unavailable at the critical time. The relevant . .
Cited by:
See Also – Cass v Amt-Sybex Ltd NIIT 21-Oct-2010
The decision is that the claimant has failed to actively pursue her claim. Unless order made. . .
See Also – Cass v Amt-Sybex Ltd NIIT 29-Nov-2010
The above claim is dismissed, the claimant having failed to comply with the Unless Order dated and issued to the claimant on 21 October 2010. The claimant is ordered to make a payment towards the costs incurred by the respondents in this case. . .
See Also – Cass v Amt-Sybex (Northern Ireland) Ltd NIIT 26-Jan-2011
The decision of the tribunal is that the respondents’ application for costs is refused. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Northern Ireland, Employment
Updated: 15 August 2022; Ref: scu.403143
