Time did not run for the purposes of CCR Order 9 Rule 10 during a period when the action was stayed pursuant to an order for a stay made under CCR Order 6 Rule 1(6) pending the filing of a medical report in support of a claim for damages for personal injuries.
Held: In an action where automatic directions have never been triggered at the time a stay is ordered, and where the lifting of the stay leads to the delivery of defences by all the defendants (or an order is made to the effect that invalid defences may stand as valid defences without redelivery), automatic directions will then run from the appropriate trigger date in the usual way.
Judges:
Waller LJ
Citations:
Unreported, CAT 30th July 1996
Statutes:
County Court Rules 1981 6.1(6) 9.10
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Cockeril v Tambrands Limited CA 21-May-1998
Even if a case is quite unsuitable for automatic directions, the plaintiff has an obligation to apply instead for specific manual directions to stand in their stead. It would be wrong to allow a plaintiff to escape from the discipline of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Personal Injury
Updated: 03 June 2022; Ref: scu.184382
