Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 6-1; Violation of Art. 14; Not necessary to examine Art. 9; Not necessary to examine P1-1; Not necessary to examine Art. 14; Pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – Convention proceedings
25528/94, (1997) 27 EHRR 521, [1997] ECHR 100
Worldlii, Bailii
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – Bishop of Roman Catholic Diocese of Port Louis and Others v Suttyhudeo Tengur and Others PC 3-Feb-2004
PC (Mauritius) A father challenged the constitutionality of a system where 50% of places in Catholic run secondary schools were allocated to Catholic childen, and fifty per cent according to merit. He feared this . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 28 August 2021; Ref: scu.165576
