Rectification of an agreement was sought.
Held: Laddie J rejected a submission that evidence of the subjective state of mind of one of the parties contained in statements which had not been communicated to the other party (‘crossed the line’) was inadmissible. I
Judges:
Laddie J
Citations:
[2004] EWHC 2974 (Pat), [2005] FSR 590
Links:
Cited by:
Principal Judgment – Cambridge Antibody Technology v Abbott Biotechnology Ltd and Another 2005
. .
Cited – Daventry District Council v Daventry and District Housing Ltd CA 13-Oct-2011
The appellant challenged refusal of rectification of its agreement with the defendant. They asserted either mutual or unilateral mistake. The parties had agreed for the transfer of housing stock and management staff to the respondents. The claimant . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property, Contract, Equity
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.227185
