The claimant had begun an appeal against a failure of his claim in negligence against his bookmakers saying that they should not have allowed him to lay bets. The respondents then sought interim orders as to costs which were settled, and now sought the costs of seeking those interim orders.
Judges:
Rimer LJ
Citations:
[2008] EWCA Civ 888
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See also – Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd ChD 12-Mar-2008
The claimant said that the defendant bookmakers had been negligent in allowing him to continue betting when they should have known that he was acting under an addiction. The defendant company had a policy for achieving responsible gambling, . .
Cited by:
See Also – Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd CA 16-Dec-2008
The claimant sought damages saying that his bookmaker had continued to accept his bets after he had made it known that he was a compulsive gambler.
Held: The bookmaker was not liable for the gambler’s losses when he failed to uphold the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Negligence, Costs
Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.277854
