Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Cadogan v Morris: CA 25 Nov 1998

A notice claiming a right to acquire new lease, but which specified a nominal rent when a full rent and premium was clearly expected to be paid, was not a valid notice and would be set aside.

Citations:

Gazette 25-Nov-1998

Statutes:

Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 42

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.78826

Posted on May 10, 2022May 10, 2022 by dlsPosted in Landlord and Tenant

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Bennett v HM Advocate: HCJ 2 Dec 1994
Next Next post: Cambridgeshire County Council v D: CA 26 Oct 1998

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,121)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (619)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (359)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,496)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (167)
  • Commercial (1,422)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,023)
  • Constitutional (948)
  • Construction (1,169)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (614)
  • Contract (6,112)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,531)
  • Crime (8,397)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,313)
  • Criminal Sentencing (1,928)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,625)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,719)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,859)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,012)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,927)
  • Housing (1,986)
  • Human Rights (19,557)
  • Immigration (56,350)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,610)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,041)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,531)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,046)
  • Jury (839)
  • Land (5,292)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,647)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,955)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,062)
  • Litigation Practice (7,049)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,752)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,894)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,740)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,755)
  • Transport (2,040)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,780)

Recent Posts

  • MT, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon: CA 21 Jan 2010
  • BW Gas As v JAS Shipping Ltd: CA 11 Feb 2010
  • Mohamed, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs: CA 10 Feb 2010
  • Bascetta and Another v Abbey National Plc: CA 10 Feb 2010
  • Thomson v HM Advocate: HCJ 5 Feb 2010
  • Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien: CA 10 Feb 2010
  • Jurgens v Estonia: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Abdullah Gunay v Turkey: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Bernatowicz v Poland: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Sizykh v Ukraine: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Duzgun v Turkey: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Janina And Ryszard Kulaga v Poland: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Zubczewski v Sweden: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Peplowski v Poland: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Iliev v Bulgaria: ECHR 12 Jan 2010
  • Allison v Her Majesty’s Advocate: SC 10 Feb 2010
  • Ghai, Regina (on The Application of) v Newcastle City Council and Others: CA 10 Feb 2010
  • Gibson and Others v Sheffield City Council: CA 10 Feb 2010
  • Humphreys v Revenue and Customs: CA 11 Feb 2010
  • Adam Szybicki v Poland: ECHR 19 Jan 2010
  • Eli Lilly and Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc: CA 9 Feb 2010
  • B v Reading Borough Council and Others: CA 8 Dec 2009
  • Beck and Others, Re Petitions To The Nobile Officium: HCJ 29 Jan 2010
  • HM Advocate v Caldwell and Another: HCJ 22 Jan 2010
  • Anderson v HM Advocate: HCJ 3 Feb 2010
  • Hopton v HM Advocate: HCJ 3 Feb 2010
  • Siddique v Her Majesty’s Advocate: HCJ 29 Jan 2010
  • Chester, Regina (on The Application of) v The Governor of HMP Wakefield: Admn 22 Jan 2010
  • B, Regina (on The Application of) v Cornwall Council and Another: CA 9 Feb 2010
  • Gomes, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: Admn 5 Feb 2010
  • Baldauf v Secretary of State for The Home Department: Admn 19 Jan 2010
  • King, Regina (on The Application of) v Government of Australia and Another: Admn 12 Jan 2010
  • Sondy v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 12 Jan 2010
  • Nursing and Midwifery Council, Regina (on The Application of) v Akinleye: Admn 19 Jan 2010
  • Hakeem, Regina (on The Application of) v Valuation Tribunal Service and Another: Admn 18 Jan 2010
  • Burns v Woolwich Crown Court and Another: Admn 14 Jan 2010
  • Jenner, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: Admn 14 Jan 2010
  • Walker v Daxbourne Int Ltd: CA 26 Nov 2009
  • In re D (Children); BD v AID: CA 9 Feb 2010
  • O’Beirne v Hudson: CA 9 Feb 2010
  • Bauer-Czarnomski, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Ealing: Admn 18 Jan 2010
  • Medeva Bv v The Comptroller General of Patents: PatC 27 Jan 2010
  • Research In Motion UK Ltd v Motorola Inc: PatC 3 Feb 2010
  • Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Transworld Oil Ltd: ComC 3 Feb 2010
  • Axel Walz v Clickair SA: ECJ 26 Jan 2010
  • Belgische Staat v Direct Parcel Distribution Belgium NV: ECJ 28 Jan 2010
  • Perkes and Another v Regina: CACD 5 Feb 2010
  • Booth v Booth and Others: CA 5 Feb 2010
  • Bromley, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and Others: Admn 3 Feb 2010
  • Crown Prosecution Service v C and Another: Admn 3 Feb 2010

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.