Cadogan and Another v Cadogan Square Ltd: UTLC 21 Apr 2011

UTLC LEASEHOLD REFORM – collective enfranchisement – price payable – whether hope value in respect of non-participating flats including caretaker’s flat – relativity – use of graphs or adjustment to market comparables to allow for benefit of Act – effect of user restriction upon rental value of caretaker’s flat – assessment of valuation evidence and of comparables – meaning of ‘taking into account’ a section 42 notice served by a non-participating tenant – form of the covenant restrictive of user which should be imposed – meaning of ‘participating tenant’ for purposes of marriage value – Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 Sch 6 paras 3 and 4.

Citations:

[2011] UKUT 154 (LC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440781