EAT Practice and Procedure – Disclosure
Allegations that Claimants had made unwarranted demands in original tribunal proceedings said to be victimisation.
Grievance procedure heard evidence relating to without prejudice discussions to show who was making demands.
Tribunal correct in allowing reference to discussions in grievance report on the basis of waiver or abuse of privileged occasion. They should also have allowed evidence of original discussions.
Judges:
Ansell J
Citations:
[2006] UKEAT 0307 – 06 – 1610, UKEAT/0307/06
Links:
Citing:
See Also – G Webster v Brunel University EAT 14-Dec-2004
EAT Race Discrimination
Novel point decided that the Employment Tribunal erred in concluding that, in a case where there was an issue as to whether the act complained of was by the Respondent (i.e. by . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Brunel University and Another v Webster and Vaseghi CA 22-May-2007
The parties had been involved in long standing disputes about the procedures in the respondents complaints of race discrimination. The claims had been dismissed, but the Vice-Chancellor then wrote publicly of unfounded unwarranted and excessive . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 08 July 2022; Ref: scu.245397
