British Data Management Plc v Boxer Commercial Removals Plc and Another: CA 28 Feb 1996

A quia timet action in a defamation case must specify the precise words which are expected to be used.

Citations:

Times 28-Feb-1996, [1996] 3 All ER 707

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

AffirmedBest v Charter Medical of England Ltd and Another CA 26-Oct-2001
The Civil Procedure Rules did not alter the previous practice in defamation actions, that the words to be relied upon should be pleaded in detail, save only in exceptional circumstances. The case had been properly struck out, as disclosing no . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Defamation

Updated: 27 October 2022; Ref: scu.78624