Brewster v Kitchell: 1795

‘Where H covenants not do to an act or thing which was lawful to do, and an Act of Parliament comes after and compels him to do it, the statute repeals the covenant. So if H covenants to do a thing which is lawful, and an Act of Parliament comes in and hinders him from doing it, the covenant is repealed.’

Citations:

[1795] EngR 616, (1795) 1 Salk 198, (1795) 91 ER 177 (B)

Links:

Commonlii

Cited by:

CitedBaily v De Crespigny QBD 1869
A lessor had covenanted that neither he nor his assigns would build on a piece of land adjoining the demised premises. A railway company, under powers derived from a subsequent private Act, compulsorily acquired the land and erected a station on it. . .
CitedIslwyn Borough Council and Another v Newport Borough Council CA 28-Jun-1993
Three local authorities disputed whether a contract had been made between them, and if so its terms, as to the financial support of a leisure centre.
Held: Later legislation need not frustrate agreement between the parties.
Hirts LJ said: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.352961