Boxsius v Goblet Freres: 1894

An ordinary business representative or adjunct of the associated agents, or any of them, cannot escape iability in defamation by regarding the communication with him as usual in the course of business.

Citations:

[1894] 1 QB 842

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedWatts v Times Newspapers Ltd, Neil, Palmer and Schilling and Lom CA 28-Jul-1995
The plaintiff author had claimed damages for defamation, saying that he had been accused of plagiarism. An apology had been given in the form requested – no qualified privilege. The plaintiff brought an associated case against his lawyer, saying . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Defamation

Updated: 22 September 2022; Ref: scu.374707