Appeal against rejection of sex harassment and discrimination claim. She said that the tribunal had given no clear inication that her allegations were either accepted or rejected.
Held: The decision adequately clarified that the tribunal had rejected the claimant’s evidence, and this concclusion was capable of being drawn from the evidence and circumstances. The appeal failed.
Judges:
Butterfield J
Citations:
[1996] UKEAT 34 – 95 – 1405
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Meek v City of Birmingham District Council CA 18-Feb-1987
Employment Tribunals to Provide Sufficient Reasons
Tribunals, when giving their decisions, are required to do no more than to make clear their findings of fact and to answer any question of law raised.
Bingham LJ said: ‘It has on a number of occasions been made plain that the decision of an . .
Cited – Levy v Marrable EAT 1984
The employee was dismissed for having worked on his own car in a dangerous manner. He admitted this, but said he had done so before to the employer’s knowledge without complaint. The employer denied this. The tribunal had dismissed the complaint. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 18 June 2022; Ref: scu.208355
