Barry v Midland Bank Plc: EAT 25 Oct 1996

It was not sex discrimination to calculate severance pay for an employee on her current part time earnings.

Citations:

Times 25-Oct-1996

Statutes:

Sex Discrimination Act 1975 6(2)

Citing:

See AlsoBarry v Midland Bank Plc EAT 2-Feb-1996
Appeal from rejection of sex discrimination claim . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromBarry v Midland Bank Plc CA 18-Dec-1997
No sex discrimination was involved in company’s retirement benefits scheme even though it was affected by differences for part time workers, and even though more women worked part time . .
See AlsoBarry v Midland Bank Plc EAT 2-Feb-1996
Appeal from rejection of sex discrimination claim . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Discrimination

Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.78264