The court was asked: ‘whether a notice that the respondents, who own the relevant premises, served on the appellants, who are assured shorthold tenants, satisfied the requirements of section 21(1)(b) of the 1988 Act. The respondents maintain that it did. The appellants dispute that on the basis that the respondents were not at the date of the notice ‘the landlord’ within the meaning of section 21(1)(b).’
Citations:
[2018] EWCA Civ 2414
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Housing
Updated: 18 June 2022; Ref: scu.628677
