Bank of Baroda v Rayarel and Others: CA 19 Jan 1995

A bank may assume that a solicitor advising a customer’s wife had acted properly. The solicitors acted for both the husband and the wife before they also gave their instructions to the solicitors.
Times 19-Jan-1995, [1995] 2 FLR 376
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedRoyal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2); Barclays Bank plc v Harris; Midland Bank plc v Wallace, etc HL 11-Oct-2001
Wives had charged the family homes to secure their husband’s business borrowings, and now resisted possession orders, claiming undue influence.
Held: Undue influence is an equitable protection created to undo the effect of excess influence of . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 02 June 2021; Ref: scu.78132