B v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 13 May 2010

The defendant appealed against his conviction for having shot a deer. He said that the District Judge should have ruled that he had no case to answer. He was said to have been one of three youths cruelly killing a fawn.
Held: There had been sufficient evidence before the district judge to open the possibility of a conviction, and, applying Galbraith, the submission of no cae to answer had been correctly rejected.

Judges:

Elias LJ, Keith J

Citations:

[2010] EWHC 1301 (Admin)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Deer Act 1991 1(2)(a)

Citing:

CitedRegina v Galbraith CCA 1981
Rejection of Submission of No Case to Answer
The defendant had faced a charge of affray. The court having rejected his submission of having no case to answer, he had made an exculpatory statement from the dock. He appealed against his conviction.
Held: Lord Lane LCJ said: ‘How then . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 24 August 2022; Ref: scu.424776