When the husband’s sole asset is a business which cannot be sold for the ancillary relief proceedings, it would be pointless to order its valuation.
Judges:
Lincoln J
Citations:
[1988] 2 FLR 490
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – P v P (Financial Provision: Non-disclosure) 1994
The applicant wife had been shown to have been guilty of considerable misconduct of the financial case. It was submitted that, as a result of that misconduct, the court should reduce the wife’s award on the application of the Section 25(2)(g) . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Family
Updated: 30 April 2022; Ref: scu.235328
