Aziz v Cyprus: ECHR 22 Jun 2004

Depriving a Turkish Cypriot living in the Government-controlled area of Cyprus of the right to vote was a breach of article 3. However: ‘States enjoy considerable latitude to establish rules within their constitutional order governing . . the composition of the Parliament, and . . the relevant criteria may vary according to the historical and political factors peculiar to each States.’
69949/01, [2004] ECHR 271
Bailii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 3
Cited by:
CitedHirst v United Kingdom (2) ECHR 6-Oct-2005
(Grand Chamber) The applicant said that whilst a prisoner he had been banned from voting. The UK operated with minimal exceptions, a blanket ban on prisoners voting.
Held: Voting is a right not a privilege. It was a right central in a . .
CitedBarclay and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and others CA 2-Dec-2008
barclay_ssjCA2008
The claimant appealed against refusal of his challenge to the new constitutional law for Sark, and sought a declaration of incompatibility under the 1998 Act. He said that by restricting the people who could stand for election, a free democracy had . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 13 January 2021; Ref: scu.198281