The Claimant sought an injunction to restrain the misuse of private and confidential information and harassment, and for damages. The information was as to the relationship between the parties and in part what the Defendant learnt about AVB’s family and acquaintances in the course of that relationship. The relationship was that of a client and a sex worker.
Tugendhat J
[2014] EWHC 1442 (QB)
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – AVB v TDD QBD 20-Jun-2013
The claimant sought a privacy injunction in respect of information he said had been learned from him by the defendantt . .
Cited by:
Cited – QRS v Beach and Another QBD 26-Sep-2014
The court gave its reasons for granting an interim injunction to prevent the defendants publshing materials on their web-sites which were said to harrass the claimants.
Held: Whilst it was important to protect the identity of the claimants, . .
See Also – AVB v TDD QBD 20-May-2014
The parties had disputed an application for an injunction and claims in harassment, and now asked the court to apportion costs.
Held: The Claimant has succeeded on a part of his case which is important, but is relatively minor in relation to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Information, Intellectual Property
Updated: 03 December 2021; Ref: scu.525170
