Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and others: EAT 4 Jun 2008

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Worker, employee or neither
Whether Claimants were (a) employees or (b) limb (b) workers. Answer no and yes. Appeal allowed in part.


Peter Clark J


[2008] UKEAT 0160 – 08 – 0406



Cited by:

Appeal fromAutoclenz v Belcher and others CA 29-Sep-2008
Leave granted to appeal. . .
At EATAutoclenz Ltd v Belcher and Others CA 13-Oct-2009
Car Valeters contracts misdescribed their Duties
The claimants worked cleaning cars for the appellants. They said that as workers they were entitled to holiday pay. The appellant said they were self-employed.
Held: The contract purported to give rights which were not genuine, and the . .
At EATAutoclenz Ltd v Belcher and Others SC 27-Jul-2011
Car Cleaning nil-hours Contractors were Workers
The company contracted with the claimants to work cleaning cars. The company appealed against a finding that contrary to the explicit provisions of the contracts, they were workers within the Regulations and entitled to holiday pay and associated . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.


Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270857