The offence of accepting an unauthorised deposit requires both knowledge of the act and an agreement to it. Where ‘consent’ is alleged against him, a defendant has to be proved to know the material facts which constitute the offence by the body corporate and to have agreed to its conduct of the business on the basis of those facts.
Judges:
Lord Taylor of Gosforth CJ
Citations:
Times 30-Jan-1996, Gazette 14-Feb-1996, [1996] 1 WLR 970
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Chargot Limited (T/A Contract Services) and Others, Regina v HL 10-Dec-2008
The victim died on a farm when his dumper truck overturned burying him in its load.
Held: The prosecutor needed to establish a prima facie case that the results required by the Act had not been achieved. He need only establish that a risk of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Banking, Crime
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.77960
