To found a complaint of contempt the risk arising from the publication must be practical rather than theoretical or illusory. Publicity concerning a named defendant before a jury during the jury trial of another charge did not give rise to a serious prejudice as ‘the practical risk of the publication engendering bias in a jury or ordinary good sense was insignificant’
Mann LJ, Brooke LJ
 1 WLR 874,  3 All ER 38
England and Wales
Cited – Attorney General v Random House Group Ltd QBD 15-Jul-2009
The Attorney-General sought to restrain the publication of a book which she said would prejudice the defendants in a forthcoming criminal trial. The publisher said that a restraint would be a disproportionate interference in its Article 10 rights. . .
Cited – HM Attorney General v Yaxley-Lennon QBD 9-Jul-2019
Application by Her Majesty’s Attorney General for an order committing the respondent to prison for contempt of court. . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 February 2021; Ref: scu.425620