Assets Recovery Agency v Olupitan and Another: 2006

The Respondents applied to strike out the claim under the Act on grounds including that it disclosed no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim and was an abuse of process.
Held: The application was refused.


Dobbs J


[2006] EWHC 1906


Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Part 5


England and Wales

Cited by:

See AlsoAssets Recovery Agency v Olupitan and Another QBD 8-Feb-2007
The claimant was responsible for recovering money under the 2002 Act, and alleged that the first defendant had been engaged in a mortgage fraud.
Held: To succeed in such a claim for recovery the Claimant must prove, ‘on a balance of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 17 May 2022; Ref: scu.248437