Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Aslam and Others v Uber Bv and Others: Misc 28 Oct 2016

The claimants, Uber taxi service contractors, claimed to be ‘workers’ with associated employment rights.
Held: They were such.

[2016] EW Misc B68 (ET)
Bailii, Reasons
Employment Rights Act 1996 230(3)(b), Working Time Regulations 1998 36(1), National Minimum Wage Act 1998
England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 25 January 2022; Ref: scu.571017

Posted on January 25, 2022January 25, 2022 by dlsPosted in EmploymentTagged Employment

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Urbsiene And Urbsys v Lithuania: ECHR 8 Nov 2016
Next Next post: The Interim Executive Board of X School v Chief Inspector of Education, Childrens Services and Skills: Admn 8 Nov 2016

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (358)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,517)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (316)
  • Commercial (1,422)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,024)
  • Constitutional (945)
  • Construction (1,171)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (838)
  • Contract (6,114)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,550)
  • Crime (8,398)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,313)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,843)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,484)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,628)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,719)
  • Environment (818)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,954)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,588)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,014)
  • Health (1,517)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,928)
  • Housing (1,994)
  • Human Rights (19,659)
  • Immigration (56,353)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,624)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,044)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,533)
  • International (955)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,044)
  • Jury (1,771)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,657)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,957)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,063)
  • Litigation Practice (7,051)
  • Local Government (1,628)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,139)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,758)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,906)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,547)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (822)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,745)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,759)
  • Transport (2,047)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Practice Directions: Insolvency Appeals (Individuals): ChD 25 Sep 1995
  • Practice Directions (Family Proceedings: Costs): FD 4 May 1999
  • Practice Direction:(Crown Office List: Time Estimates and Paginated Bundles): COL 27 Oct 1994
  • Practice Direction: Structured Settlements: CA 18 Mar 1992
  • Port of London Authority v Payne and Others: EAT 7 May 1992
  • Port of London Authority v Payne and Others: CA 3 Nov 1993
  • Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue: CA 27 Apr 2001
  • Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansalis-Osaki-Pankki: ChD 22 Jul 1992
  • Oldham Borough Council v Attorney General: CA 28 Jul 1992
  • O Palomo Sa v Turner and Co; Turner and Co v O Palomo Sa: CA 28 Jul 1999
  • Penn v Bristol and West Building Society and Others: CA 24 Apr 1997
  • O’Neill v Governors of St Thomas More Roman Catholic Voluntary Aided Upper School: EAT 7 Jun 1996
  • O’Flynn v Adjudication Officer: ECJ 23 May 1996
  • Plenderleith v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons: PC 19 Dec 1995
  • Pickwell and Another v Lincolnshire County Council: EAT 11 Sep 1992
  • Pickford v Imperial Chemical Industries Plc: HL 30 Jun 1998
  • Petch v Gurney (Inspector of Taxes): CA 8 Jun 1994
  • Personal Representatives of Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments Ltd: PC 18 Dec 1995
  • Pemberton v Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Southwark: CA 13 Apr 2000
  • Partridge v Adjudication Officer Case: ECJ 2 Jul 1998
  • Parochial Church Council of Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote With Billesby, Warwickshire and Another: ChD 7 Feb 2000
  • P v National Association of School Masters/Union of Women Teachers: CA 25 May 2001
  • Omoruyi v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 12 Oct 2000
  • Nottingham University v Fishel: QBD 19 Jan 2000
  • Nottingham City Council v Farooq: QBD 21 Oct 1998
  • Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley and Another: CA 24 Apr 2001
  • Northern General Hospital NHS Trust v Gale: EAT 11 May 1993
  • North Devon District Council v Secretary of State for Environment, D Rottenbury B E Rottenbury: QBD 12 May 1998
  • New Zealand Guardian Trust Co Ltd v Brooks: PC 17 Nov 1994
  • Nerva and Others v R L and G (T/a Paradiso E Inferno and Trota Blu Wine Bar): CACD 15 May 1996
  • Mohammed v Alaga and Co (A Firm): CA 2 Nov 1998
  • Murrell v Healy and Another: CA 5 Apr 2001
  • Moore v Secretary of State for Environment and New Forest District Council: CA 18 Feb 1998
  • Mehdi Norowzian v Arks Ltd and Guinness Brewing Worldwide Limited (No 2): CA 11 Nov 1999
  • Norglen Ltd (In Liquidation) v Reeds Rains Prudential Ltd and Others; Circuit Systems Ltd (In Liquidation) and Another v Zuken-Redac: HL 1 Dec 1997
  • Nationwide Building Society v Various Solicitors (No 3): ChD 1 Mar 1999
  • National Westminster Bank Plc v Story and Another: CA 7 May 1999
  • National Westminster Bank Plc and Another v Inland Revenue Commissioners: HL 24 Jun 1994
  • Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design: QBD 11 Jul 2001
  • Nanglegan v Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust: CA 23 Jan 2001
  • Mulvey v Secretary of State for Social Security: HL 20 Mar 1997
  • Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Shaire and Another: ChD 25 Feb 2000
  • Morse v Wiltshire County Council: EAT 1 May 1998
  • Morgans v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 18 Feb 2000
  • Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford United Football Club Ltd and Others: CA 21 Jul 2000
  • Modahl v British Athletics Federation: HL 23 Jul 1999
  • Mobbs v Nuclear Electric Ltd: EAT 8 Aug 1996
  • Mitchell v The Queen: PC 24 Jan 1998
  • Law Society v KPMG Peat Marwick and Others: CA 29 Jun 2000
  • McNulty v Marshalls Food Group Ltd: OHCS 7 Jan 1999

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.