Asch v Austria: ECHR 26 Apr 1991

There was no violation of Article 6 where the statement of a co-habitee was read at the trial without her being called to give evidence but, in Austrian law, a co-habitee cannot be compelled to be a witness and the court said that the right on which the co-habitee ‘relied in order to avoid giving evidence cannot be allowed to block the prosecution’.
12398/86, (1991) 15 EHHR 597, [1991] ECHR 28
Worldlii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 6
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedRegina v W (Reference Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1972) CACD 8-May-2003
The allegation was of a serious assault on the defendant’s wife. The prosecution considered she would not be a reliable witness, and did not call her. Other evidence being inadmissible, the defendant was acquitted. The AG appealed.
Held: There . .
CitedRegina v Davis HL 18-Jun-2008
The defendant had been tried for the murder of two men by shooting them at a party. He was identified as the murderer by three witnesses who had been permitted to give evidence anonymously, from behind screens, because they had refused, out of fear, . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 30 August 2021; Ref: scu.165119