EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Review
Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
The Employment Tribunal did not err in refusing at a review hearing to vary its decision. The new evidence would not have an effect on the decision. Observation in Meteor Parking applied: the Employment Tribunal is the better place for such issues to be determined.
Judges:
McMullen QC J
Citations:
[2010] UKEAT 1708 – 09 – 1207
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Daleside Nursing Home Ltd v Mathew EAT 18-Feb-2009
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Costs
Where at the heart of a claim is an explicit lie alleging racial abuse, the Employment Tribunal was in error failing to find that the Claimant acted unreasonably in . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Arrowsmith v Nottingham Trent University CA 10-Jun-2011
The claimant appealed against an order for costs made against her after rejection of her employment claim.
Daleside lays down no point of principle of general application; that where a party lies about a central allegation in the case an award . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 26 August 2022; Ref: scu.425809
