Aribisala v St James’ Homes (Grosvenor Dock) Ltd: ChD 14 Mar 2008

The claimant contracted to buy two apartments from the defendant. The contract purported to exclude section 49.
Floyd J
[2008] EWHC 456 (Ch), Times 04-Apr-2008, [2008] 12 EG 96, [2009] 1 WLR 1089, [2008] 3 All ER 762, [2008] 19 EG 206, [2008] 2 EGLR 65
Law of Property Act 1925 49(2)
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedLondon Borough of Wandsworth v Allison CA 15-Apr-2008
The claimant had applied for emergency housing, saying that he had suffered a deep vein thrombosis, and was vulnerable under the 1996 Act. The authority said that its finding that the VT would not put him at additional risk if homeless, was one of . .
See AlsoAribisala v St James Homes (Grosvenor Dock) Ltd ChD 12-Jun-2007
The parties had agreed in a contract for the sale and purchase of land to exclude the application of section 49(2). The buyer had failed to comply with a notice to complete.
Held: The parties cannot contract out of section 49(2). The . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 13 February 2021; Ref: scu.266470