The appellant contended that the country guidance for Eritrea to which he was to be returned, was out of date and inaccurate.
Held: Such a complaint could only be accepted where the country guidance appeared to be up to date, if supported by fresh and additional evidence such as might undermine the country guidance.
Judges:
Richards LJ
Citations:
[2006] EWCA Civ 48, Times 08-Feb-2006
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – IN (Draft Evaders, Evidence of Risk) Eritrea Cg IAT 24-May-2005
The Tribunal having examined the available evidence decided that not all returnees of draft age would be at risk if returned to Eritrea. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238355
