EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs
Challenge on various grounds to the Tribunal’s decision to refuse the successful employer’s application for costs at the end of a full hearing. Held – the Tribunal did not err in law; guidance in Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Yerrakalva [2012] IRLR 78 applied.
Judges:
David Richardson J
Citations:
[2012] UKEAT 0021 – 12 – 1604
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Yerrakalva v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and Another EAT 8-Dec-2010
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs
Discrimination claim withdrawn – Judge awards Rs 100% of their costs, not on the basis that the claim had been misconceived or unreasonably pursued from the start but . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.459920
