The respondent sought deletion of a penal notice attached to a court order. The notice was not brought to the notice of the judge, but attached to the copy served.
Held: The words of rule 7(4) suggested that the penal notice might be attached to the copy to be served. It was properly included in a ‘copy of the order’ as served and should not be deleted.
Park J
Times 08-Nov-2002, Gazette 21-Nov-2002
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Anglo-Eastern Trust Ltd and Another v Kermanshahchi CA 22-Feb-2002
The claimant sought repayment of loans. The judge had refused summary judgement, but ordered the defendant to pay a sum into court, failing which his defence would be struck out. The defendant appealed saying the condition for making a conditional . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 29 September 2021; Ref: scu.178029
