The solicitor appealed from disciplinary findings after she had sent extraordinary text messages. She complained hat the tribunal had wrongly refused to anonymise the activity and or hat it had wrongly anonymised the identity of the two law firms she had worked for.
Held:
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Morris
Citations:
[2021] EWHC 2709 (Admin)
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Lu v Solicitors Regulation Authority Admn 6-Jul-2022
No Unmnecessary Anoniymity
The appellant, having been acquitted of misconduct, complained of the anonymisation of various partied by the SDT.
Held: The court was critical of the approach taken by the Tribunal. ‘I see no good reason why Ms Pearson, Ms Stone, Mr Ewing and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Legal Professions
Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.668457
