The tenant appealed against an order for the rectification of the lease agreement between the parties. The recorder at first instance had found that both parties had been mistaken in their belief about the effect of a lease and had granted rectification.
Held: The appeal was dismissed.
Judges:
Arden, Lloyd-Jones, Fulford LJJ
Citations:
[2013] EWCA Civ 1005
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – FSHC Group Holdings Ltd v Glas Trust Corporation Ltd CA 31-Jul-2019
Rectification – Chartbrook not followed
Opportunity for an appellate court to clarify the correct test to apply in deciding whether the written terms of a contract may be rectified because of a common mistake.
Held: The appeal failed. The judge was right to conclude that an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant, Equity
Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.514254
