The claimant sought damages alleging patent infringement. The defendant responded by saying that the patent was invalid as a scheme, rule or method for doing business as such.
Judges:
Lewison J
Citations:
[2006] EWHC 997 (Pat)
Links:
Statutes:
Cited by:
Appeal from – Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd and others, In re Patent Application GB 0314464.9 in the name of Neal Macrossan Rev 1 CA 27-Oct-2006
In each case it was said that the requested patent concerned an invention consisting of a computer program, and was not therefore an invention and was unpatentable. In one case a patent had been revoked on being challenged, and in the other, the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 11 July 2022; Ref: scu.258186
