The claimant solicitors had successfully challenged search warrants issued by the respondents and been awarded their costs.
Rafferty LJ, Stuart-Smith J
[2014] EWHC 2179 (Admin)
Bailii
Citing:
Cited – Malkinson v Trim CA 13-Sep-2002
The court was asked: ‘is a solicitor who has been represented by his own firm in the successful defence of proceedings brought against him personally, entitled (under an order for costs in his favour) to the profit costs of his firm in defending . .
See Also – AB and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Huddersfield Magistrates’ Court and Another Admn 10-Apr-2014
The claimants challenged the lawfuness of search warrants issued by the respondent court. They were solicitors, and were related to a person suspected of murder who was thought to have fled the country. The officers were looking for evidence that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Costs
Updated: 16 December 2021; Ref: scu.533802
