The claimants had overpaid large sums of VAT over several years, and been, eventually, refunded, with simple interest. The claimants now said that the interest should have been compounded. The revenue contended that such a claim was excluded under European law. Held: As a matter of statutory construction, the claims were excluded by sections 78 … Continue reading Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 May 2010
Whether an unincorporated association was liable to registration on subscriptions paid by members, was not merely a matter of its constitution, but of what in reality members received for their subscriptions. If those were services of a VATable nature, then the subscriptions were chargeable. Citations: Times 12-May-1998, Gazette 10-Jun-1998, [1998] EWCA Civ 785 Statutes: Value … Continue reading Eastbourne Town Radio Cars Association v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 12 May 1998
The court was asked as to the effectiveness under European law of sections 78 and 80 of the 1994 Act. Held: Henderson J focused on the fact that section 80(7) excludes any common law liability to repay the overpaid VAT, and inferred that it must also exclude any common law liability to pay interest: ‘the … Continue reading FJ Chalke Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: ChD 8 May 2009
The taxpayers said that the Commissioners’ assessment to VAT was out of time, and appealed a finding that it was not. They said that time should run from the point at which the Commissioners knew the facts upon which the assessment was based. The Commissioners argued that time could not begin to run until the … Continue reading DFS Furniture Company Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 16 Mar 2004
Liability for VAT was determined at date of supply of services not date of bill. Citations: Times 14-Feb-1996, [1996] STC 581 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1983 4 5 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – B J Rice and Associates v Customs and Excise Commissioners QBD 18-Apr-1994 Time of supply on continuous service … Continue reading B J Rice and Associates (A Firm) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 14 Feb 1996
Application for judicial review of a decision by the Defendants to require the Claimant to account for value added tax (‘VAT’) for a period of three years under the so-called reverse charge provisions contained in s. 8 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 in respect of legal services provided in other jurisdictions and paid … Continue reading Medical Protection Society Ltd, Regina (On the Application of) v HM Revenue and Customs: Admn 6 Nov 2009
The House was asked whether an action for unlawful means conspiracy was available against a participant in a missing trader intra-community, or carousel, fraud. The company appealed a finding of liability saying that the VAT Act and Regulations contained the entire regime. Held: Criminal conduct at common law or by statute can constitute unlawful means … Continue reading Total Network Sl v Revenue and Customs: HL 12 Mar 2008
Value added tax – registration of companies, groups and divisions – consideration of decision by the Commissioners to degroup a company under section 43C of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 – extent of appeal to the tribunal from a degrouping decision . .
The claimant had sought repayment of overpaid VAT, and the respondent resisted arguing that this would be an unjust enrichment. A reference to the European Court was sought.
Held: It was not possible to say that the House’s opinion was acte . .
The company sought repayment by way of restitution for overpaid taxes. The tax had been repaid, but only as simple interest, and not compounded. Both parties now appealed from a decision that the Act did not apply to exclude under sections 78 and 80 . .
The claimants had recovered very substantial overpayments made of VAT. They sought recovery of compound interest. The ECJ, on reference, said that this was a matter for national law.
Held: The claim succeeded. The sections of the 1994 Act were . .
The appellants had overpaid under a mistake of law very substantial sums in VAT over several years. The excess had been repaid, but with simple interest and not compound interest, which the now claimed (together with other taxpayers amounting to 17 . .
UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – claim for repayment of VAT – failure of UK to implement Article 4.5 of Sixth VAT Directive – erroneous guidance issued by HMRC – curtailment of limitation period for claims – section 80 VAT . .
References: [2013] UKUT 596 (TCC), [2014] BVC 501, [2014] STC 789 Links: Bailii UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – claim for repayment of VAT – failure of UK to implement Article 4.5 of Sixth VAT Directive – erroneous guidance issued by HMRC – curtailment of limitation period for claims – section 80 VAT Act 1994 – … Continue reading Leeds City Council v HMRC; UTTC 3 Dec 2013
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Our law-index is a substantial selection from our database. Cases here are restricted in number by date and lack the additional facilities formerly available within lawindexpro. Please do enjoy this free version of the lawindex. Case law does not ‘belong’ to lawyers. Judgments are made up of words which can be read and understood (if … Continue reading law index
