The claimant awaited trial for GBH. The claimant sought judicial review of directions given for 1) to direct disclosure of material to the claimant; 2) to adjourn the application to enable him to call oral evidence; 3) to consider any material outside the copy witness statements relied upon by the prosecution; and 4) to dismiss … Continue reading Regina (on the Application of) Snelgrove v the Crown Court at Woolwich, and the Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 29 Sep 2004
The defendant appealed against an extension of the custody time limit. Held: The Act provides against an extension where the prosecution has not acted with due speed. Here the delay in large part arose in one way or another at the request of the defence. The challenge failed. Citations: [2003] EWHC 1993 (Admin) Links: Bailii … Continue reading Pierens, Regina (on the Application of) v Customs and Excise: Admn 28 Jul 2003
Lord Bingham: ‘The court made plain in Ex p McDonald, as indeed is plain on the face of the statute, that when seeking an extension or a further extension of the custody time limit the Crown must show that there is good and sufficient [reason] for making the extension and that it has acted with … Continue reading Regina v Leeds Crown Court, Ex parte Bagoutie: 31 May 1999
Appeals were brought complaining as to the apparent reversal of the burden of proof in road traffic cases and in cases under the Terrorism Acts. Was a legal or an evidential burden placed on a defendant? Held: Lord Bingham of Cornhill said: ‘The overriding concern is that a trial should be fair, and the presumption … Continue reading Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions; Attorney General’s Reference No 4 of 2002: HL 14 Oct 2004
The defendant agreed to indemnify the insured ‘in respect of all sums which the insured shall become legally liable to pay as compensation arising out of’ various matters including wrongful arrest, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. The insurer contended that the use of the word ‘compensation’ excluded awards of exemplary damages. Held: The contention was … Continue reading Lancashire County Council v Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd: CA 3 Apr 1996
Judges: Lord Justice Nolan And Justice Roch Citations: [1991] EWHC 1 (QB), [1991] Crim LR 699, [1991] 3 All ER 439, (1992) 94 Cr App R 272, (1991) 155 JP 1003, [1991] 3 WLR 235, [1991] RTR 271, [1991] 2 QB 532 Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 23(3), Costs in Criminal Cases … Continue reading Director of Public Prosecutions v Denning and Another: QBD 7 Mar 1991
The defendant appealed against his conviction for sexual assault. The issue was whether a note written by the complainant to her teacher was admissible as evidence of recent complaint to corroborate her statement. Similar allegations had been made against him in Scotland, but he had not been convicted. He said that evidence of those complaints … Continue reading Regina v Beedles: CACD 31 Jul 1996
The claimant was concerned as to the low and declining rate of prosecution for rape and serious sexual assaults against women as a proportion of allegations made. They complained of a change in policy moving away from a ‘merits based approach’. Judges: Lord Burnett of Maldon LCJ, Holroyde, Laing DBE LJJ Citations: [2021] EWCA Civ … Continue reading End Violence against Women Coalition, Regina (on The Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: CA 15 Mar 2021
The appellant challenged an order to pay over andpound;18,000 costs after losing her complaint of statutory nuisance against the Parish Council. She had complained as to the noise coming from a playground. Held: She had brought the proceedings knowing of several reasons making her action inappropriate and unnecessary. However, she had followed proper procedures, the … Continue reading Bentley-Thomas v Winkfield Parish Council: Admn 5 Feb 2013
Procedures on Withdrawal of Life Support Treatment The patient had been severely injured in the Hillsborough disaster, and had come to be in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). The doctors sought permission to withdraw medical treatment. The Official Solicitor appealed against an order of the Court of Appeal permitting the action. Held: The appeal failed. … Continue reading Airedale NHS Trust v Bland: HL 4 Feb 1993
Whether the Crown Court has power under regulation 3 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Regulations 1986, made under section 19(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, to make a costs order against a party to criminal proceedings in favour of another party’s counsel. Citations: [2012] EWHC 3570 (Admin), [2013] WLR(D) 13, [2013] 2 … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service, Regina (on The Application of) v Bolton Crown Court and Another: Admn 16 Nov 2012
The court asked whether the Divisional Court was bound by previous decisions of that court, and answered: ‘we find it difficult to imagine that a single judge exercising this (supervisory) jurisdiction (of the High Court) would ever depart from a decision of a Divisional Court.’ Citations: [1985] QB 67 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: … Continue reading Regina v Manchester Coroner, ex parte Tal: 1985
The defendant appealed aganst his conviction for conspiracy to engage in moneylaundering. At trial he pleaded guilty subject to a qualification that he had not known that the money was the proceeds of crime, though he may have suspected that it would be. Held: (Baroness Hale of Richmond dissenting) The appeal succeeded: ‘the Crown’s principal … Continue reading Saik, Regina v: HL 3 May 2006
Jackson J said: ‘Save in exceptional circumstances, it is quite inappropriate for this court to step into the shoes of the crown prosecutor and to retake decisions which Parliament has entrusted to the crown prosecutor under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.’ Judges: Jackson J Citations: [2003] EWHC 3266 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of … Continue reading F, Regina (on the Application of) v Crown Prosecution Service and Another: Admn 12 Dec 2003
The applicant had successfully defended himself in person on a motoring charge, and appealed refusal of an order for costs in his favour. Loss of earnings. Citations: [2008] EWHC 948 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 19(1), Costs in Criminal Cases General Regulations 1986 3 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Magistrates, Costs Updated: … Continue reading Crowch, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 15 Apr 2008
The claimants had been detained under the 1971 Act, after completing sentences of imprisonment pending their return to their home countries under deportations recommended by the judges at trial, or chosen by the respondent. They challenged as unlawful the respondent’s, at first unpublished, policy introduced in 2006, that by default, those awaiting deportation should be … Continue reading Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: SC 23 Mar 2011
An innocent bystander had been shot dead by police mistaking him for a suicide bomber. The claimant, a cousin, challenged decisions not to prosecute any officer for murder or manslaughter or any other criminal offence. Held: Review was refused: ‘A decision to prosecute can have a profound effect on the accused; and a decision not … Continue reading Da Silva, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions and Another: Admn 14 Dec 2006
The court set out the characteristics of abuse of process in criminal matters. It may be an abuse of process if: ‘the prosecution have manipulated or misused the process of the court so as to deprive the defendant of a protection provided by the law or to take unfair advantage of a technicality.’ and ‘The … Continue reading Regina v Derby Crown Court, ex parte Brooks: QBD 1985
The appellant had been sentenced to life for firearms offences. After a successfully appeal, a retrial was ordered. More than two years had passed, after a previous attempt failed for absent witnesses. Held: Referred to the US decision in Barker and Wingo (1972) 407 US 514, invoking the sixth amendment – ‘In all criminal prosecutions, … Continue reading Bell v Director of Public Prosecutions of Jamaica: PC 1985
The court considered the test for whether the requirement for the Attorney General’s consent to a prosecution had been obtained, and said: ‘The analysis of the statutory language: . . there are two questions. i) When were the proceedings instituted? ii) If the permission of the Attorney General was not given before the proceedings were … Continue reading Lambert, Regina v: CACD 3 Apr 2009
An order made by a judge that the prosecution pay the defence’s costs, which had been unnecessarily incurred after a failure properly to disclose evidence to them, was an order made as part of the Crown Court trial, and so was not susceptible to judicial review. Citations: Times 23-Feb-2001 Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 … Continue reading Regina v Leicester Crown Court, ex parte Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 23 Feb 2001
(Trinidad and Tobago) The appellant had been charged in 1981 with offences alleged to have been committed shortly before. The proceedings continued until his appeal for one was dismissed in 1988. The wounding charges were proceeded with only in 1994. He complained that the delay was an abuse, and his appeal succeeded. The prosecutor now … Continue reading Director of Public Prosecutions and others v Tokai and others: PC 12 Jun 1996
The offence of establishing a radio station without a licence is an absolute offence; no knowledge or mens rea was needed. The presumption that mens rea was required could be rebutted where the offence concerned an issue of public safety. Citations: Times 14-Aug-1996, [1996] EWCA Crim 729, [1997] 1 Cr App R 209, [1997] 1 … Continue reading Regina v Blake: CACD 31 Jul 1996
The defendant was faced with a charge under the 1882 Act. The prosecution required that the consent of the Attorney-General be given before proceedings commenced. The consent was only given after he had been charged, but before the trial. Held: Section 63 of the 1982 Act should be interpreted as meaning that instituting proceedings relates … Continue reading Regina v Elliott: CACD 1985
Custody time limits cease to apply once a jury has been sworn. Judges: Gage J Citations: [1997] EWHC Admin 829 Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 22 Cited by: Cited – In Re Hickman and Rose (Solicitors) (Wasted Costs Order) (No 10 of 1999) CACD 19-Apr-2000 After a trial was aborted, the solicitors, acting on … Continue reading In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Subjiciendum and In the Matter of Bozkurt: Admn 3 Oct 1997
Application for vexatious litigant order. Citations: [1997] EWHC Admin 123 Links: Bailii Statutes: Supreme Court Act 1981 42 Litigation Practice Updated: 25 May 2022; Ref: scu.137068
Citations: [1997] EWHC Admin 124 Links: Bailii Statutes: Supreme Court Act 1981 Criminal Practice Updated: 25 May 2022; Ref: scu.137069
Judicial Review of a costs award to counsel 11 months after trial. Citations: Ind Summary 10-May-1993 Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 16 Criminal Practice Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.87194
The applicant was a barrister. He had been tried and acquitted of criminal charges, and had been awarded cost from central funds. He appealed from a refusal of a claim for payment for the time he spent in preparation. Held: The applicant was bound by the Bar’s Code of Conduct, which would have required him … Continue reading Khan v Lord Chancellor: QBD 17 Jan 2003
An application to extradite a former head of state for an offence which was not at the time an offence under English law would fail, but could proceed in respect of allegations of acts after that time. No immunity was intended for heads of state. International law prohibiting torture has the character of jus cogens … Continue reading Regina v Bartle and Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte; Regina v Evans and Similar (No 3): HL 24 Mar 1999
The court considered when a judge should allow a defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty: ‘only rarely would it be appropriate for the trial judge to exercise his undoubted discretion in favour of an accused person wishing to change an unequivocal plea of guilty to one of not guilty. Particularly this is so in … Continue reading Regina v Drew: CACD 1985
The respondent appealed against a finding that the provision which made a loan agreement completely invalid for lack of compliance with the 1974 Act was itself invalid under the Human Rights Act since it deprived the respondent lender of its property rights. It was also argued that it was not possible to make a declaration … Continue reading Wilson v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry; Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2): HL 10 Jul 2003
The Home Secretary has no power to discontinue extradition proceedings, since they are not criminal per se. Citations: Gazette 08-Feb-1995 Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 23 Criminal Practice Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.86547
The applicant a 17 year old assisted the police in a murder investigation on the understanding, induced by the police, that he would not himself be prosecuted. Some weeks later, at the instance of the CPS, the applicant was charged with a lesser offence of having destroyed evidence connected with the same crime. He submitted … Continue reading Regina v Croydon Justices Ex Parte Dean: QBD 9 Mar 1993
Where an application to extend custody time limits is opposed on the basis of prosecution delay, the parties should provide for the court an agreed chronology of events, and the judge should also give his reasons for granting the extension. Citations: Times 31-May-1999 Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 22(3)(b) Criminal Practice Updated: 09 April … Continue reading Regina v Chelmsford Crown Court, Ex Parte Mills: QBD 31 May 1999
The defendant argued that once the prosecutor had all the material on which the prosecution was eventually brought, then for the purposes of section 11(2) time began to run. Held: When considering the time limits for a prosecution under the Act, the officer investigating is the prosecutor, until the case is taken over by the … Continue reading Morgans v Director of Public Prosecutions: QBD 29 Dec 1998
The defendant appealed against his conviction for having unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16. He was himself under 16, and complained that the section turned the girl into a victim and him into an offender and that this was discriminatory. Held: Article 6 was not concerned with issues relating to the substance of … Continue reading E v Director of Public Prosecutions: QBD 1 Feb 2005
The appellant was charged with persistently soliciting a woman for the purposes of prostitution under section 2(1). He had been seen on several occasions driving his car slowly around a red light district. On one occasion he beckoned a woman towards him. As he was driving with the woman in his car, he was stopped … Continue reading Darroch v The Director of Public Prosecution: CACD 1990
A police officer appealed against his conviction for manslaughter after being involved in a road traffic accident. Two were killed. The policemen complained as to the direction given on gross negligence manslaughter. Held: Adomako could not apply in jurisdictions where causing a death by reckless driving is a possible alternative to a charge of manslaughter. … Continue reading Brown v The Queen (Jamaica): PC 13 Apr 2005
Humphrys was charged with driving while disqualified. The issue was the correctness of the identification by a police constable. In evidence, Humphrys denied that he was the driver, or indeed that he had driven any car during the year in question. He was acquitted. Later he was charged with perjury said to arise from his … Continue reading Director of Public Prosecutions v Humphrys: HL 1977
A public authority, and the Prison Service in particular, is free, within the limits of rationality, to decide on any policy as to how to exercise its discretions; it is entitled to change its policy from time to time for the future, and a person whose case falls within the scope of the policy is … Continue reading In Re Findlay, in re Hogben: HL 1985
Each appellant complained of the disclosure by the respondent of very old and minor offences to potential employers, destroying prospects of finding work. Two statutory schemes were challenged, raising two separate questions, namely whether any interference with Article 8 ECHR is: (1) ‘in accordance with the law’ (‘the legality test’) and (2) ‘necessary in a … Continue reading Gallagher for Judicial Review (NI): SC 30 Jan 2019
The claimant sought judicial review of a decision of the DPP to intervene in and abandon her private prosecution of two doctors involved n what she said was a decision to carry out abortions which decsions were affected by the sex of the foetus. At the instigation of a newspapers, two women had attended clinics … Continue reading Hubert, Regina (on The Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions and Another: Admn 18 Dec 2015
The applicant had been convicted of a robbery and served a long prison sentence. After release he was awarded damages against some of the police officers for assault. The DPP decided not to proceed against the officers by way of criminal proceedings. The applicant’s conviction was later quashed. The prosecutor replied saying he had applied … Continue reading Regina v Director of Public Prosecutions ex parte Treadaway: Admn 31 Jul 1997
Need for Certainty in Scope of Offence The appellant suffered a severe chronic illness and anticipated that she might want to go to Switzerland to commit suicide. She would need her husband to accompany her, and sought an order requiring the respondent to provide clear guidelines on the circumstances under which someone might be prosecuted … Continue reading Purdy, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 30 Jul 2009
The defendant appealed against convictions for rape and indecent assault under the 1956 Act. The allegations dated from 1985 to 1989 when the complainant had been between 9 and 13. The prosecution brought in a doctor who said that in 1993 D complained of sexual abuse by Z when she was a young girl. D … Continue reading Regina v Z: CACD 23 Jan 2009
The bank challenged measures taken by HM Treasury to restrict access to the United Kingdom’s financial markets by a major Iranian commercial bank, Bank Mellat, on the account of its alleged connection with Iran’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programmes. The bank sought to have the direction given under section 7 of the 2008 Act. … Continue reading Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2): SC 19 Jun 2013
A mother sought to challenge guidelines issued by the respondent which would allow doctors to protect the confidentiality of women under 16 who came to them for assistance even though the sexual activities they might engage in would be unlawful. Held: A person under 16 who was otherwise competent was entitled to seek medical assistance, … Continue reading Axon, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Health and Another: Admn 23 Jan 2006
CANLII (Supreme Court of Canada) Appellant was committed for trial on seven counts of fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit fraud arising out of the conduct of his Toronto telephone sales solicitation room. Pursuant to appellant’s directions, telephone sales personnel telephoned U.S. residents and attempted to induce them to buy shares in two … Continue reading Libman v The Queen: 10 Oct 1985
DPP – no Power to Refer For Investigation Challenge to refusal of respondent to refer a matter to the police for investigation as to potentially criminal behaviour. Held: Mr Redston’s challenge was not arguable. He had not actually requested such a disclosure. The DPP is not an investigator and, as such, has no power to … Continue reading Redston, Regina (on The Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 5 Nov 2020
The defendant appealed against his conviction, for sex offences some 33 years earlier, saying that the convictions had been unfairly obtained. Evidence had been available since 1980, but a decision not to prosecute had been taken. Held: ‘the judge’s command of the evidence and the legal issues concerning the evidence with which he had to … Continue reading Taylor v Regina: CACD 20 Dec 2013
A Dutch serviceman who had been arrested for desertion and brought before a magistrate who ordered him to be handed over to the Dutch military authorities under the Allied Forces Act 1940. An application for habeas corpus was rejected by a Divisional Court. The Court of Appeal held that they had no jurisdiction to entertain … Continue reading Amand v Home Secretary and Minister of Defence of Royal Netherlands Government: HL 1943
The plaintiff appealed against the dismissal of her claims for trespass and breach of duty by the defendant’s officers. In divorce proceedings, she had been ordered to return certain household goods to her husband, but had failed yet to do so. The husband attended the property with a solicitor and two police officers without prior … Continue reading McLeod, Mealing (deceased) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner: CA 3 Feb 1994
Judicial review was sought of a decision by the respondent to prosecute a child for her alleged sexual abuse of her younger sisters. Agencies other than the police and CPS considered that a prosecution would harm both the applicant and her sisters. It was said that the applicant had herself been groomed by an adult … Continue reading E and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 10 Jun 2011
The applicant said that the defendant had unlawfully failed to provide detailed guidance under section 10 of the 1985 Act, on the circumstances under which a prosecution might lie of a person performing acts which might assist another to commit suicide. The claimant suffered a severe degenerative illness and anticipated that she would want to … Continue reading Purdy, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions and Another: Admn 29 Oct 2008
The claimant sought judicial review of a decision of the respondent to take over and discontinue his private prosecutions arising from public order incidents, saying that the respondent’s policy was unlawful in restricting such prosecutions. Held: The request was refused. The policy was lawful. The respondent had now adopted exactly the policy criticised in Duckenfield … Continue reading Gujra, Regina (on The Application of) v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 9 Mar 2011
An application was made to discharge an anonymity order made in previous criminal proceedings before the House. The defendant was to be retried for rape under the 2003 Act, after an earlier acquittal. The applicant questioned whether such a order could properly be made, and said that in any event it should be discharged. Held: … Continue reading Attorney General’s Reference No 3 of 1999: Application By the British Broadcasting Corporation To Set Aside or Vary a Reporting Restriction Order: HL 17 Jun 2009
The applicant suffered mutiple sclerosis and considered that she might wish to go abroad to end her life. She asked the court to make more clear the guidance provided by the Director as to whether her partner might be prosecuted under section 2(1) if he accompanied her to Switzerland. She said that the failure to … Continue reading Purdy, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions and Another: QBD 29 Oct 2008
The appellant had twice begun private prosecutions only to have them taken over by the CPS and discontinued. He complained that a change in their policy on such interventions interfered with his statutory and constitutional right to bring such a prosecution. Held: The appeal failed (Lord Mance and Lady Hale dissenting). There had indeed been … Continue reading Gujra, Regina (on The Application of) v Crown Prosecution Service: SC 14 Nov 2012
The House considered whether the long established rule of the criminal law presuming that a child did not have a guilty mind should be set aside. Held: Doli incapax, the presumption of a child’s lack of mens rea, is still effective and good law, but a child is not capable at law without the requisite … Continue reading C (A Minor) v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 17 Mar 1995
(Orse Kebeline) The DPP’s appeal succeeded. A decision by the DPP to authorise a prosecution could not be judicially reviewed unless dishonesty, bad faith, or some other exceptional circumstance could be shown. A suggestion that the offence for which a prosecution was authorised was framed so as to breach the accused’s human rights was to … Continue reading Regina v Director of Public Prosecutions, ex parte Kebilene and others: HL 28 Oct 1999
The claimant a retired Chief Constable sought judicial review of a decision to commit him for trial on a charge of unlawful imprisonment. The suspect and now prosecutor had been arrested and held in custody, but without the necessary timely review by the defendant’s officers. He now pursued a private prosecution. Held: The review was … Continue reading Craik, Chief Constable of Northumbria Police, Regina (on The Application of) v Newcastle Upon Tyne Magistrates’ Court: Admn 30 Apr 2010
Deception as to identity did not undermine consent The claimant had been an environmental campaigner. She had had a sexual relationship with a man who was unknown to her an undercover police officer. She now challenged the decision not to prosecute him for rape. Held: Her claim failed. Case law suggested that no prosecution had … Continue reading Monica, Regina (on The Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 14 Dec 2018
The solicitors appealed against a wasted costs order made by the Crown Court as to their actions in the successful defence. They had not disclosed alibi evidence on advice from counsel on being unable to obtain proofs of evidence, until the day before the trial when the defendant’s father gave a statement. The judge made … Continue reading Joseph Hill and Company, Solicitors, Re Wasted Costs Order Made Against: CACD 21 May 2013
The defendant solicitors, DLA Piper, had sought an order for a witness summons against the BDO, which had been accountants to DLA’s client now accused of false accounting. BDO successfully resisted the issuing of the summons, and was awarded its costs. The judge in the Crown Court had found herself unable to aard costs on … Continue reading DLA Piper UK Llp v BDO Llp: Admn 13 Dec 2013
The House considered the principle that the confession of a defendant is inadmissible in a joint criminal case against a co-defendant. In a trial for murder, one party was accused of requesting a middleman to arrange for the murder by a third party. . .
The High Court may review, on an application made by a properly interested party, a decision made by a Crown Court under the Act. Although this related to a trial on indictment, the Crown Court judge had made an order without jurisdiction. . .
A Crown Court decision to stay an indictment for lack of jurisdiction, was not susceptible to Judicial Review. This was a ‘decision affecting conduct of trial’. The House considered the meaning of the phrase ‘other than its jurisdiction in matters . .
The Director of Public Prosecutions sought to challenge by way of judicial review a decision of the Croydon Youth Court that proceedings re-instituted by him pursuant to section 22B of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 against youths for robbery . .
The prosecutor appealed against the defendant’s acquittal for causing a public nuisance in having approached a woman police officer posing as a prostitute. He said that as a single act it could not amount to a nuisance. The prosecutor argued that . .
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
The court confirmed the continued right of private prosecution. Watkins LJ set out section 6 of the 1985 Act and observed: ‘These provisions clearly envisage that persons other than the Director may institute proceedings and prosecute. As Mr Lawson said, and I accept, it would indeed be surprising if that were not so. One has … Continue reading Regina v Stafford Justices ex parte Customs and Excise Commissioners: 1991
Citations: [1996] EWHC Admin 347 Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 3 Criminal Practice Updated: 25 May 2022; Ref: scu.136895
The Commissioners of the Inland Revenue did have power to conduct a prosecution at the Crown Court without first obtaining the consent of the Attorney General, even though it was a police officer had actually laid the charge. A prosecution was conducted on behalf of a police force where the force had been involved in … Continue reading Regina v Criminal Cases Review Commission, ex parte Hunt: CA 24 Nov 2000
The claimant sought return of items removed by the defendants under the 1984 Act. A decision had been made against a prosecution by the police. The police wished to hold onto the items to allow a decision from the second defendant. Held: The defendant’s appeal succeeded. The offence allowed an officer to seize material found … Continue reading Scopelight Ltd and Others v Chief of Police for Northumbria: CA 5 Nov 2009
Citations: [2004] EWHC 221 (Admin) Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 22(3) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Regina (Gibson and Another) v Winchester Crown Court QBD 24-Feb-2004 The defendant challenged extension of the custody time limit, saying that the prosecuting authorities had not acted with due diligence to take the case forward. … Continue reading Regina (Bannister) v Guildford Crown Court: Admn 2004
The council laid complaints against the defenedant that it had not properly re-instated road surfaces after completing works. It now appealed, by way of case stated, against the court’s acceptance of the defendant’s argument that the large number of individual complaints would lead to a risk of a substantially greater punishment than parliament had intended, … Continue reading Hertfordshire County Council v National Grid Gas Plc: Admn 2 Nov 2007
The defendant appealed against refusal of a defendant’s costs order in his favour. Citations: [2009] EWHC 558 (Admin), (2009) 173 JP 332 Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 16(1)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Costs, Magistrates Updated: 27 November 2022; Ref: scu.323749
The defendant had been acquitted. Orders had been made both for payment of his legal costs, and also for re-imbursement of his own costs. The defendant was accused of serious fraud, and had engaged an American attorney to assist him before instructing English solicitors. Held: It was preferable for such costs applications to be made … Continue reading Brewer, Regina (on the Application of) v Supreme Court Costs Office: Admn 27 Jul 2006
The claimant challenged refusal of the award of his costs of defending charges against him which had on appeal been allowed. Judges: Maddison, Hickinbottom JJ Citations: [2012] EWHC 3469 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 16 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice, Costs Updated: 12 November 2022; Ref: scu.467106
Appeal from the decision of the determining officer to reduce the sum claimed in respect of her costs as a private prosecutor following an order of the court for Ms Matete to be compensated in accordance with s17 Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. Judges: Costs Judge Rowley Citations: [2022] EWHC 2660 (SCCO) Links: Bailii Statutes: … Continue reading Magon, Rex v: SCCO 12 Oct 2022
The defendant was accused of a sexual offence alleged to have been committed some 15 years earlier. He asked the magistrates to dismiss the charge as an abuse of process, and now appealed their refusal. Held: The onus was on the accused to show, to a civil standard that a fair trial could not now … Continue reading Regina v Telford Justices, ex parte Badhan: CACD 1991
The court was asked whether statutory changes made to the ability of acquitted defendants in the Crown Court to recover their costs from central funds are compatible with the European Convention of Human Rights. Held: The inability of acquitted defendants in the Crown Court to recover (a) any of their privately incurred costs after 1 … Continue reading Henderson, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: Admn 27 Jan 2015
The defendant, having succeeded at the crown court in reducing his ban for driving offences, now appealed a small order for costs in his favour. Held: He was entitled to the just and reasonable costs of making the appeal. The award of andpound;150 instead of andpound;650 without giving reasons was wrong. No solicitor whether in … Continue reading Galandauer v Snaresbrook Crown Court: Admn 27 Jun 2006
Whilst awaiting trial, P had offered evidence against others on other serious crimes. On conviction, the judge was supplied with a statement explaining his assistance. He now appealed sentence of 17 years imprisonment for assorted serious drugs crimes. Blackburn’s case raised similar issues. Held: The sections sought to give a statutory framework to encouraging assistance … Continue reading P, Regina v; Regina v Blackburn: CACD 22 Oct 2007
Where a court proposed a wasted costs order it was obliged by the regulations to hear the party against whom the order was sought. An order was made allowing the solicitors to make representations before a date, but the final order was made without having heard any representations, and the engrossed order made no reference … Continue reading In Re Wiseman Lee (Solicitors) (Wasted Costs Order) (No 5 of 2000): CACD 5 Apr 2001
Defendants were to face trial in the US, accused of monstrous crimes. The appellant challenged the release of information to the USA by the respondent to support such prosecutions when the death penalty was a possible outcome of a conviction: ‘The issue in this case is the legality of the Government’s decision to provide mutual … Continue reading Elgizouli v Secretary of State for The Home Department: SC 25 Mar 2020
The defendants had been convicted on evidence obtained from them by inspectors with statutory powers to require answers on pain of conviction. Subsequently the law changed to find such activity an infringement of a defendant’s human rights. Held: There was no requirement for a court to implement a Human Rights Court decision retrospectively to require … Continue reading Regina v Lyons, Parnes, Ronson, Saunders: HL 15 Nov 2002
Twins were conjoined (Siamese). Medically, both could not survive, and one was dependent upon the vital organs of the other. Doctors applied for permission to separate the twins which would be followed by the inevitable death of one of them. The parents, devout Roman Catholics, resisted. Held: The parents’ views were subject to the overriding … Continue reading In Re A (Minors) (Conjoined Twins: Medical Treatment); aka In re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation): CA 22 Sep 2000
The solicitors appealed against a wasted costs order. In defending a client on an allegation fo domestic violence they sought assistance from a local authrityabout a foster child. They drafted a witness summons, and served it on the authority, but the judge refused the summons. The solicitors failed to inform the authority that the summons … Continue reading Angela Taylor Solicitors, Regina v: CACD 28 Nov 2008
Judges: Costs Judge Leonard Citations: [2022] EWHC 1129 (SCCO) Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 17 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See also – Macmillan Cancer Support, Regina (on The Application of) v Andrews SCCO 27-May-2022 . . Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. Costs Updated: 24 July … Continue reading Macmillan Cancer Support, Regina (on The Application of) v Toogood (Costs): SCCO 12 May 2022
Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 1304 Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.640049
Judges: Davis LJ, Warby, Julian Knowles JJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 1270, [2019] WLR(D) 410 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 4 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.640048
The applicants are employees of or volunteers for Greenpeace. They boarded a cargo ship, preventing it continuing its voyage to harbour. They did so because they believed the cargo contained unlicensed animal feed and thus the importation was in breach of domestic criminal law. They were arrested the following day and tried for an offence … Continue reading Ayliffe And Others v United Kingdom: ECHR 6 May 2008
The court considered whether the District Judge had been correct to refuse to issue summonses for private prosecutions where there was a suggestion that only a private dispute at stake. Held: It ‘never was any requirement that a private prosecutor had to demonstrate that it was in the public interest that he should bring a … Continue reading Ewing, Regina (on the Application of) v Davis: Admn 2 Jul 2007
The defendant renewed his application for the review of a decision to extend the custody time limit. Judges: Laws LJ, Stanley Burnton J Citations: [2007] EWHC 935 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 22(3) Crime Updated: 10 July 2022; Ref: scu.251642
The applicants sought judicial review of decisions to extend the custody time limits. Held: Where a further extension is sought, it is in the public interest and the interests of justice that the court should confine its consideration under paragraph (b) to whether there has been due diligence and expedition in relation to matters giving … Continue reading Thomas v Central Criminal Court; Stubbs v Same: Admn 7 Jul 2006
Judges: Lord Justice Scott Baker The Honourable Mr Justice Owen Citations: [2005] EWHC 2733 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 16 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice, Costs Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.235878
The claimants had been convicted of murder, but their tariffs had not yet been set when the 2003 Act came into effect. They said that the procedure under which their sentence tarriffs were set were not compliant with their human rights in that the tarriff was set by reference back to a judge without a … Continue reading Hammond, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 1 Dec 2005
Appeal against a wasted costs order against the defence barrister as regards remarks made in his closing speech which were said to have been prejudicial to the fairness of the trial. Held: Allowed. Judges: The Lord Burnett of Maldon LCJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 1398 Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 19A Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Le Brocq v The Liverpool Crown Court: CACD 1 Aug 2019
