Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Sood: CACD 13 Mar 1998

The motive of a perjurer is not relevant to the question of whether the offence itself is committed. It goes as to mitigation only. Citations: Times 24-Mar-1998, [1998] EWCA Crim 917 Statutes: Perjury Act 1911 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 11 October 2022; Ref: scu.153791

Regina v Carroll and others: CACD 1993

The defendants appealed against their convictions for perjury, saying that the judge had failed to remind the jury of the need for the falsity of the statement at issue to be corroborated by a second independent witness. Held: The falsity of the statements had been established by evidence from three independent an unconnected witnesses. Though … Continue reading Regina v Carroll and others: CACD 1993

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation: CA 10 Nov 1947

Administrative Discretion to be Used Reasonably The applicant challenged the manner of decision making as to the conditions which had been attached to its licence to open the cinema on Sundays. It had not been allowed to admit children under 15 years of age. The statute provided no appeal procedure, and the applicant sought a … Continue reading Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation: CA 10 Nov 1947

Regina v Cooper: CACD 5 May 2010

The defendant appealed his conviction for perjury. On being accused of using a mobile phone when driving, he claimed to have been using a hands free system. Evidence later showed that his kit had been fitted only after the date of the alleged offence. The defendant said that no independent corroboration had been provided of … Continue reading Regina v Cooper: CACD 5 May 2010